Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

“It is unwise, unfair, and unjust to force upon a majority of women, a measure which is obnoxious to all their ideals of womanhood, in order that the wishes of a small minority may prevail.”

> “It is unwise, unfair, and unjust to force upon a majority of women, a measure which is obnoxious to all their ideals of womanhood, in order that the wishes of a small minority may prevail.”

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (7).
[–] • 2 pts

Back then I think in most States you needed to own property and almost no women did. That makes sense too.. or maybe women just weren't poisoned by faggotry, liberalism and toxic feminism yet..

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

That was the thing. You voted if you owned property. Yes the property was in the man's name but women DID vote back then. Because you voted as a unit. The property owner and their family casted one vote together. Separating the vote was one of the first steps to separate the family.

And single (usually widowed) land owning women absolutely voted too. They framed it to appear women couldn't vote when the reality is that family just voted together.

[–] • 1 pt

Thanks for that information. There was parts of that I didn't know. Explains (((their))) lies.

[–] • 1 pt

I think that it started like that at least. If you made at least 5 pounds a year (I don't care, I'm not English) you would be eligible to vote. But it changed later, removing that restriction so that it included everyone.