Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

521

According to , the Jim Cramer of archaeology:

It acts as a kind of gateway into more subversive beliefs, without a doubt. If you follow some of the larger accounts that promote this on Twitter or X, or on YouTube, within the comments, it's just filled with a wide range of harmful beliefs, like disbelief in climate change, for example, or anti-vaccination, or boilerplate antisemitism or white supremacy. It's not to say that everybody who believes in Atlantis has these beliefs, but among the communities that are there, there's a prevailing acceptance of these other beliefs as well.

According to [Flint Dibble](https://archive.ph/d6n79), the Jim Cramer of archaeology: > It acts as a kind of gateway into more subversive beliefs, without a doubt. If you follow some of the larger accounts that promote this on Twitter or X, or on YouTube, within the comments, it's just filled with a wide range of harmful beliefs, like disbelief in climate change, for example, or anti-vaccination, or boilerplate antisemitism or white supremacy. It's not to say that everybody who believes in Atlantis has these beliefs, but among the communities that are there, there's a prevailing acceptance of these other beliefs as well. [original link](https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/flint-dibble)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (13).
[–] • 1 pt

Plato didn't just write about Atlantis, but also about his dialogues with Egyptian priests about past civilizations. So it's far from the philosophical exercise this guy says it is.

Also note that Egyptian priests of that time were guardians of superior technology and probably genetically different to today's population of Egypt.

[–] • 1 pt

For sure. They were more related to Brits, I guess, than to anyone else. If Tutankhamen was representative of the upper class genetics.