![Gradualism is our downfall. [720x722 - 303KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/lH0AtU.jpg){kind=link}
Oh okay. Well it's literally my job to do good research and have accurate interpretations of said research. Otherwise I go bankrupt. So I'll just trust what I'm saying because it's what the text literally says and I'll throw your bizarre rantings in the garbage bin. Because I'm pretty fucking confident from your asinine ramblings and hilarious chimp outs that you do not get paid to use your brain.
Then tell me, what is the author's end goal?
Is it for all of the immigrants to eat McDonalds and go square dancing every weekend.
Or was the author pointing out that by pushing immigration too quickly, the safety the Jews have and the control the Jews have over the government was at risk. And they need to push patriotism in order to prevent people from uniting along ethnic lines and wiping out the Jews and/or their power structure.
Does the author wan't immigrants to eat McDonalds and go square dancing every weekend? Yes. But the reason why they want that is to prevent people from uniting along ethnic lines and wiping out the Jews.
Therefore, the end goal is not brotherly love. The end goal is keep the Jews in power.
By going along with this patriotism push, the Jews will retain power as Whites become a minority in the US.
I already said I'm not reading or discussing anything about this paper with you until you can demonstrate some level of competence. You tried to make some bizarre argument about how the author arguing for assimilation was referring to Americans assimilating to civic nationalism, even though the other 9 instances he mentioned assimilation was in reference to immigrants, assimilation by definition refers to foreigners, the whole paper is about assimilating immigrants, and he said that civic nationalists can't be allowed to control the narrative because their anti-immigration views provide a threat to Jewish interests.
This is ample evidence to conclusively show your interpretation is bullshit. If you can't accept this and just keep going "but...but what about this other thing?" Then the whole discussion is fucking pointless.
Like if we can't even agree that 2+2=4 then why the fuck would I then go on to discuss algebra with you? It makes no fucking sense. There's no point arguing about.
Address the points I listed. Otherwise it's a waste of time. I have no interest in anything else until you stop trying to weasel out of this. It's word for word exactly what he said, and you're trying to convince me he said something else. It's fucking stupid.
For fuck's sake - How many bullshit excuses are you going to try to pull?
IMMIGRANTS
I just asked you about IMMIGRANTS.
What is the author's end goal? - Both options are about IMMIGRANTS and IMMIGRATION.
Tell me, what is the author's end goal?
Is it for all of the IMMIGRANTS to eat McDonalds and go square dancing every weekend in order to unite us all in brotherly love.
Or was the author pointing out that by pushing IMMIGRATION too quickly, the safety the Jews have and the control the Jews have over the government was at risk. And the Jews need to push patriotism on the IMMIGRANTS to stop all Americans, including IMMIGRANTS, from uniting along ethnic/religious lines and wiping out the Jews and/or their power structure.
Does the author wan't IMMIGRANTS to eat McDonalds and go square dancing every weekend? Yes. But the reason why they want that is to prevent IMMIGRANTS from uniting along ethnic/religious lines, because if they don't prevent IMMIGRANTS from uniting along ethnic/religious lines, there will be a backlash which will cause everyone to unite along ethnic/religious lines which will wipe out the fucking Jews and all their power.
Therefore, the end goal is not brotherly love. The end goal is keep the Jews in power.
If the Jews push patriotism on the IMMIGRANTS, the Jewish author says that'll prevent all Americans (which includes White Americans) from uniting along ethnic/religious lines. Resulting in the Jews retaining power as Whites become a minority in the US.
(post is archived)