Even Wikipedia and Jerusalem Post calls the Holocaust story into question.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonne_Maman https://www.jpost.com/omg/is-bonne-maman-an-anti-nazi-jam-the-internet-wants-to-think-so-659344
Because that's classic psych tactics. We should use them more.
Take a feel good story thats obviously untrue and easily refuted, and make it wonderful and reinforce an idea you wish people not to question. 80% of people will believe it. They want to believe because it feels good. It feels right. They don't investigate because why would they not want to feel good?
Then you take your "reputable and trusted" source, who has always said this thing you want people to believe is a fact, and have them regrettably inform the other 20% that indeed it may not be true, but that the truth of the other totally true thing we want you to believe is totally true guys. Then they never go beyond that because it feels good. It feels right to know and be smart. I'm smart because I know that story was false even though I never question it farther guys!
You capture the believers and reinforce an idea, and then you capture the skeptics by giving them a truth on top of the original lie. Everyone feels good and everyone believes you. You reinforce trust in your controlled sources and reinforce your narrative.
(post is archived)