It doesn't sound organic to me, the cuban move, there's something that doesn't fit We all know what's the official relationship between US and cuba, you only have wiki to open for that, it ranges from bad to mediocre However we know much less about the relationship between cuba and "stateless actors", call them the internationale clique if you will, or spectre a la james bond. And those actors, have a relationship with states, at the intelligence and military level, because commerce, because contractors, because state contracts, because politics, and more. And those actors, tend to play both sides, because it's better for their business, their end game. ... Long story short what I see here, is an attempt at a reenactment of the pinochet military coup Because why would cuba support the protesters? Because muh commie comrade? Give me a break. Because US bad? Lol, there's no problem with the us, if they (the regime) get to rule over the island and they (us) pay to play over there, it's cool, cuban regime is more than willing to provide. So in the end there's no real problem, soviet union is long gone, it's pay to play now. So why would they get dirty in the chilean mess? What do they have to gain? Nothing but shit as far as I'm concerned, if the story is "beta cucks VS American Imperialism©" So it's not that, there's something else They don't act on behalf of the US, officialy or covertly, that would be too obvious a fucking reporter/whistleblower could crap all over the place in no time like it happened in the past with gary webb Pretty sure they do it for the actors mentioned above, and yes it could be a concerted effort to force washington's covert help toward chile, just like during the good old days, putting chile between the anvil and the hammer once again But what would be the end game of this "mascarade"? Idk What about the banks this time? https://youtu.be/Z66Tfe1Znf8?t=280