>If their intent is to hold onto power, wouldnt they attempt to stabilize the social and economic problems the u.s. is facing, rather than go for another pandemic/lockdown? I think they need a crash to assert the maximum amount of authoritarianism. It creates a general set of circumstances in which they can continue to insert themselves into people's lives. Essentially, the vision is to "man in the middle" every process. >I mean, realistically another lockdown is what I expect, I'm just thinking out loud and wondering what makes you come to that conclusion. Primarily, I base this on "coded" astroturfing. When you see something that is totally bogus, but being pushed by the media, it usually becomes accepted as fact, despite being insane. By now, most Voat and Poal users are pretty good, relative to the rest of the world, at spotting astroturfing. The way I collect data from multiple sources allows me to see a burgeoning media narrative. Media narratives and psychological operations are slowly tested on smaller scales, first. A lot of it is throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks. The cabal seemingly WANTS another lockdown and they are testing the waters on what it might be. First, I saw chatter about "fungal pandemic." This would likely backfire because a lot of ailments can be treated with antifungals. In fact, "coinfections" are a thing and a dual treatment of antibiotics and antifungals likely cure a lot of things. The pet antifungal seemingly can cure small cell cancers. Lyme is thought by many to also be a coinfection interaction. Dandruff, experienced by millions, can be cured with ketoconazole and chlorahexadine sulfate. For these reasons, I think the cabal does not want to risk making people too afraid of fungi, just yet. The other alternative, which hasn't quite fizzled out is the "Twindemic" which would just be another virus. They have played with "variants" but seeing as how the virus isn't actually available to review, nobody can actually know if there are any variants and, scientifically, I don't think there is anything to back it up. They've mainly been changing the definitions of phylogenetic standards to make SARS COV 2 seem real, anyways. From what I can tell, they have about maximized their ability to fudge numbers and facts. However, this merely means that they are studying on how to sink the informational hooks even deeper. A reset will be required and re-education/miseducation will be a huge part of that, as far as they are concerned. Defending your school boards from outside influences will be very important, going forward.