Well, I guess they just find ways to rationalise it all as a fulfilment anyway, if it doesn't fit, they try to make it fit. How much have you studied those texts? What do you think of Ragnarok or Kali Yuga ? Or the Zoroastrian prophecies? Can it all be reduced to "Tribalism"? The timeline that Atheists put forward is entirely based on Jewish nonsense, and that Pharisee cult does not predate Christianity. Contrary to popular belief it is the Talmud which has precedence over the Tanakh, they use one to interpret the other, and the interpretations are just a reflection of the nature of the people. The Talmud was written after Christianity was established, and was based on the Oral Law of the Pharisees. Most modern Jews just claim that most of the Old Testament stuff is just a bunch of fables & allegories, they aren't interested in proving that they were in Egypt at all- they are usually far more interested in Kabbalah, since that promises personal success in life and it's eclectic, so it provides a bridge to manipulating other peoples via their pagan teachings. People say that there is no evidence of the Exodus narrative, when there are the Hyksos, who were invited into the lands, built up Avaris, became numerous, were enslaved & culled, and somehow eventually came to dominate Egypt. I've not seen any genetic studies/ comparisons on the bodies found there though, but the architecture they built is found in Canaan too. We didn't spring up in the mountains of Northern/ Western Europe like edelweiss. The prototypical Caucasoid looked like us, and the MENA population are a mixture, the main ingredient of which is European, they were historically classified as "Caucasian" too. [The label "Arab" is derived from the word "Ereb" which means mixed.](https://biblehub.com/hebrew/6154.htm) Then, what gives them the unique features that are separate from Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongaloid, Australoid, like the Hither-Asiatic nose, must be the native Canaanite ancestry, which is the common denominator for peoples with those traits. The point is: the people you are talking about, whether it's a MENA group or not, were not in a vacuum, that's a ridiculous notion, they obviously knew about us as one of the main racial groups. Jews are a further mixture of MENA and European, Sephardic being mostly Southern European admixture, Ashkenazi being mostly Western/ Eastern European admixture. You're giving them a lot of credit actually, you're handing them all the validity they wanted, instead of pointing out their lies and trying to establish a more accurate picture of those lands as well as North Africa and the Fertile Crescent. You could easily deprive them of any legitimacy. For instance, they claim to be Judeans, yet they 're-established' the borders for Israel, and then Greater Israel, its a farce. And people who think it's all "desert people" stuff are retarded, there are deserts in America, are Texans and Arizonians "desert people"? MENA don't look like they do because they evolved out of deserts, they look like that because they are demonstrably a mixture of different racial groups. The history of that area has a lot of relevance to us, just as the Egyptian & Babylonian history does. Our Latin alphabet actually came from Phoenicians, and the Phoenicians evidently based it off of Egyptian Hieroglyphs. The Phoenicians had colonies all over the coasts of Europe and left plenty of evidence to indicate it. They set up extensive maritime trade routes, and they've even found cannabis in Egypt, which is very strange, but also, on a separate occasion, tin from Britain. We are named after the Phoenician Princess "Europa," why is that, do you think? So do you think they were all MENA? Giving them too much credit. Why would lactose intolerant sandniggers, who are native to Canaan, write a fanfic about "ruddy" milk-drinking, giant-slaying colonisers from Egypt?