I was pondering what makes the fundamentl difference between types like us, and the rest

It seems that, while considering elements and events, patterns, we start with the view/premise that, people in control have full control or near full control, and can do this and that whenever and wherever they want, so we tend to see the "invisible hand" where other people don't see anything. And they don't see, or fail to see, anything suspicious because they start with a different view/premise that if they had to pull such stunt, themselves, they wouldn't know where to start and they can't begin to picture how such a large organization/"conspiracy" could even fly one bit and go unnoticed on top of that

Without trying to be a fucking centrist, that I despise btw but I digress, I think the truth is in the middle; their control is not absolute and is intermittent in the sense that, nothing is static and sometimes the conjecture is just bad, the window of opportunity is too narrow, for various reasons, some stuffs are broken, some key people died, are sick, "oh fuck it's not our guy occupying that position atm". Shit happens, in a nutshell, reality is by definition anything but a controlled environment

So, back to elon musk; it is possible that he colludes with them to some degree, because he has to, for practical reasons, and that at the same time he enjoys a relative independence because while he's rich, he's only rich, not part of the "genocidal NWO" club. How? Maybe because he didn't compromise himself by fucking minors to begin with... Like yeah he's factually with them as long as they don't deem him an existential threat or a liability... And at the same time he isn't their pet because they lack the leverage, he's not a deviant/perv

What I'm saying is that musk could be that weird animal like the zebra; it's not really a mule it's not really a horse, it's in between

Mel gibson is a weird animal too. Notorious antisemite and at the same time hollywood actor still invited at the oscars

No doubt at all.