Man explains bud light's, target's etc.'s actions and why it isn't a short sell [2:51] - it's a (((communist))) takeover of (once) American brands which will solidify well-established (((brands))) as replacements.

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

755

•

Man explains bud light's, target's etc.'s actions and why it isn't a short sell [2:51] - it's a (((communist))) takeover of (once) American brands which will solidify well-established (((brands))) as replacements. (vid8.poal.co)

Makes far, far, far, far, far more sense than 's short sell position explanation. That's good but dubious as fuck. They're just companies, sure, but it's part of destroying a people. It's like avenue #1 of destroying a people, make it forget itself, it's history and yes even corporations are part of history. So broaden your mind a bit and realize that a reaction of "muh corporation" is just you demonstrating you're defeated. Though that's not to say I care about Target (then) and Bud Light (then) or now, but I do have memories that are part of my own history that are meaningful and are a part of both of those corporations many years ago.

The destruction is not at the top and never has been at the top. It's at the bottom, it's the workers.

Makes far, far, far, far, far more sense than @picman's short sell position explanation. That's good but dubious as fuck. They're just companies, sure, but it's part of destroying a people. It's like avenue #1 of destroying a people, make it forget itself, it's history and yes even corporations are part of history. So broaden your mind a bit and realize that a reaction of "muh corporation" is just you demonstrating you're defeated. Though that's not to say I care about Target (then) and Bud Light (then) or now, but I do have memories that are part of my own history that are meaningful and are a part of both of those corporations many years ago. The destruction is not at the top and never has been at the top. It's at the bottom, it's the workers.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (5).

[–] • 3 pts

Yeah well maybe

That being said if your identity depends/relies on commercial brands to exist you're screwed, that's a fucken token identity to begin with, the fuck is that?

Oh a beer brand is dead and some people even start getting off the sauce entirely as a result, how is this bad?

DId I mention most beers are completely filled with shit already?

link

(post is archived)

You can claim this sub in /s/subrequest