WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Makes far, far, far, far, far more sense than 's short sell position explanation. That's good but dubious as fuck. They're just companies, sure, but it's part of destroying a people. It's like avenue #1 of destroying a people, make it forget itself, it's history and yes even corporations are part of history. So broaden your mind a bit and realize that a reaction of "muh corporation" is just you demonstrating you're defeated. Though that's not to say I care about Target (then) and Bud Light (then) or now, but I do have memories that are part of my own history that are meaningful and are a part of both of those corporations many years ago.

The destruction is not at the top and never has been at the top. It's at the bottom, it's the workers.

Makes far, far, far, far, far more sense than @picman's short sell position explanation. That's good but dubious as fuck. They're just companies, sure, but it's part of destroying a people. It's like avenue #1 of destroying a people, make it forget itself, it's history and yes even corporations are part of history. So broaden your mind a bit and realize that a reaction of "muh corporation" is just you demonstrating you're defeated. Though that's not to say I care about Target (then) and Bud Light (then) or now, but I do have memories that are part of my own history that are meaningful and are a part of both of those corporations many years ago. The destruction is not at the top and never has been at the top. It's at the bottom, it's the workers.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

01:03:19

Does he say jacob rothschild or is it another waste of time and a piece of subversion?

e; Nope. It goes on about vanguard, blackrock and maybe a few others (I closed it because who cares about them?)

[–] 0 pt

it is something that is adequate for sheeple, first level

the second level is to ask the sheeple: who owns vanguard ?