>*"Nosferatu" has been presented as stemming from an archaic Romanian word "Nesuferitul", meaning "the offensive one" or "the insufferable one", and is synonymous with "vampire". Alternatively, it could stem from the Greek "Nosophoros", meaning "disease-bearing".* The offensive, insufferable, and disease-bearing kikes are the basis for the vampire in myths and lore, which have been retold to the young over generations to warn of the danger of kikes abducting and draining them of their blood for their sacrifices to satan. https://poal.co/s/AnonExplains/372999 | https://poal.co/s/4chan/732033 | https://poal.co/s/Jewspiracy/739745 | https://poal.co/s/Jewspiracy/715668    "Nosferatu" is cohencidentally close to "Noseofajew", which would fit with meaning to be wary of those with the literally the "nose of a jew" or risk being abducted and sacrificed in their blood rituals. --- >Bram Stoker's 1897 novel 'Dracula' is extremely well-known and was the catalyst for the popularization and mass marketing of the myths and legends associated with vampirism. It is commonly believed that Stoker took his inspiration for Dracula from Romania and the infamous fifteenth century Prince of Wallachia: Vlad Dracula (Vlad the Impaler). > >The reason for this assertion, commonly found in the popular literature on Dracula, is that we know Stoker was aware of Vlad the Impaler and had made copious notes on Romania and its history, which allowed him to write an absolute blockbuster of a Gothic horror novel. What this conventional narrative leaves out is that Stroker made far more notes based on his research on the occult and vampirism than on Vlad the Impaler and Romania. > >Also worth noting is that Stoker also set another vampire story, published slightly later than 'Dracula', called 'The Wampyre Count' set in Austrian Styria. Clearly for Stoker then the vampire isn't just linked to Romania. > >The problem is that Count Dracula is not, as it happens, actually based on Vlad Dracula at all. > >Scholars, particularly those of Romanian origin, have long known and pointed out that Count Dracula is, if anything at all, very loosely based on Vlad Dracula. As Belfort observed, the only thing that Count Dracula shares with his Vlad Dracula is his name. > >The real origin of Count Dracula is actually found in George du Maurier's 1895 novel 'Trilby'. > >The villain of 'Trilby', Svengali, is an Ashkenazi jew who seduces, dominates and exploits young, nubile European girls; exactly like Count Dracula. Dracula, just like Svengali, is cast as a 'sinister foreign seducer'. > >This also jives with the oft suppressed fact that Stoker held overt racial nationalist opinions and regarded the world as being divided between the (European) master race and the subject races. He also invoked racial nationalist rhetoric in his work, while having, what can only be described as, strong anti-Semitic beliefs in regards to jews. > >Indeed, as Rebecca Stott has observed, Stoker is a good example of the late Victorian intellectual advocate for the need to 'patrol' and tear out root and branch any racial or sexual degeneracy to ensure the health of the national body. > >Therefore is it any wonder that Stoker would have taken a sinister alien jew, Svengali, as his model for the ultimate sinister creature of the night?