I think it's a bit of both. /r/SuperStraight is up to 23k subscribers now, and it seems to be made up of equal parts of:
- Lesbians that are sick of transwomen expecting sex from them
- Gays that are sick of transmen expecting sex from them
- Straights that are sick of trans expecting sex from them
- Trolls pushing the superstraight narrative because it's funny watching the troons sperg out and the normies sticking up for themselves
I’m confused, could you please elaborate?
Is this “super gay/straight” stuff just a silly way of saying “no trannies allowed?” Like, instead of saying “I’m into real women” they’re bitching out and saying “yeah, ok, I accept you, but I won’t fuck you.”
If that’s the case, prefacing straight with “super” implies normal straight people would be fine with fucking a tranny. Disgusting.... did I get that about right?
pretty much nailed it. The crazies' statement that "trans women are women" implies that straight men and lesbians should be attracted to, and have sex with, trans women. By adding the "super" prefix, it explicitly removes trans people from their sexual orientation.
And the troons really hate that, because it shows them that they will never pass.
If that’s the case, prefacing straight with “super” implies normal straight people would be fine with fucking a tranny. Disgusting.... did I get that about right?
That's just it, going by the redefinitions of the crazies' re-understanding of common English, normal straight people should absolutely be sucking the trans penis. By going through this whole superstraight thing, trolls are culterjamming the culturejamming kikes by using their own subversion tactics against them. Which gets them really pissed off because that's how they destroy a civilization and they can't come up with new things.
(post is archived)