While my opinions on gay shit are definitely aligned with most other anons around here, I have to ask…what is it that we want a person like Milo to do? I would think we would want him to stop being a fag, right?
So then, he stops being a fag and then we’re still going to treat him as if he’s still a fag.
Yeah, I’d bet he sucked him some dicks in his past. Ok but now he’s not gay, so why bring up his past and beat him over the head with it?
While I’ve certainly never touched any dick but my own, there are also (lesser) things I’ve done that I now regret and that I do no more.
Is repentance not even a thing?
Don’t we want faggot dems to stop being faggot dems and start living/voting correctly?
I know at least some percentage of the people on this site used to be dems and then woke up. I’ve talked to many of you. What would be the point of me bashing you because you used to be a dem, especially when you’re not anymore?
I’m all for fair criticism, but this seems like unfair criticism to me.
Pretend he's a kiddie diddler instead of a fag and ask that question again.
With pedos there are innocent victims involved, so apples and oranges. In fact, a lot of gays are gay precisely because some pedo did things to them at an early age. I think (if I remember correctly) that Milo has said that such child abuse can make people gay and that such a thing happened to him.
They're both degenerates. I mean if you're hot for Milo or whatever that is your business.
(post is archived)