as in what? you’re going to ban me if i dont jump on the milo gangbang?
the guy was trying to rationalize his own trauma because he didnt want to view himself as a victim. he didn’t say it was okay to fuck kids. he said it happens and, in some cases, it may be preferable to the alternative, eg suicide. i dont agree with his dichotomous framing, but ffs at least he has the balls to have the conversation honestly, and he listens and responds to the rebuttal. he speaks crassly and with self deprecating humour because its effective in reaching an audience that generally refuses to listen. that often comes at the expense of nuance required to uphold principle effectively, but principles dont mean shit if no one listens or you are not allowed to follow them.
if you want to twist everything he says to make him a caricature of the faggot pedo archetype, go ahead but it doesnt serve anyone to extinguish anyone who genuinely seeks to promote your shared goals. milo was a net good for the conservative movements, and he got torched as a test case for cancelling alex jones and everyone else to the right of mccain.
as in what? you’re going to ban me if i dont jump on the milo gangbang?
Nice try twisting words. There's no gangbang on Milo. He made the apology of pedophilia on many occasions.
he didn’t say it was okay to fuck kids. he said it happens and, in some cases, it may be preferable to the alternative,
Go be a pedo apologist fanboy somewhere else then.
(post is archived)