WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

495

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

It's not this instance I'm talking about, it's the fact that it can be vetoed the first time despite the majority already had and then revoted on. Should just be veto proof the first time.

[–] 0 pt

Should be. But this way offers the opportunity for (((intimidation or bribery)))