WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

I'm currently on Cinnamon 19.3 and I'm wondering should I just go right to the new 21.1 or what's stable enough that I can sit on for the next couple of years?

I'm currently on Cinnamon 19.3 and I'm wondering should I just go right to the new 21.1 or what's stable enough that I can sit on for the next couple of years?

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

There's been a couple of changes and updates in the past 2 years. It SHOULD be ok to just upgrade, but if it was me I'd do a fresh install to be safe. Or better yet, install a rolling distro

[–] 1 pt

Yeah it's probably what I'll do. I'll probably end up screwing up the update anyway so a fresh installs usually the way I've always done it. I have no idea what a rolling distro is. is that something that's just like a preference selection?

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Ok, so in the Linux world, there's 3 major types of distro rollout types. First is a static release. It means its one and done without major updates. Slackware falls in this category. Gentoo can, also. Great for computers you want to NEVER change once installed and set up.

Next you have point release distros. Linux Mint, what your using, is an example of such. They have releases on a fixed schedule, usually 6 months, but others like Debian can go years between releases. IN THEORY, they're very stable as well and give good reliability. In practice, especially with any distro that is based on Ubuntu, this may or may not be the case. I've found it's not a great distro solution compared to the next type of release system. Too many things change between releases and updates are a coin flip about whether you need a reinstall or not.

Rolling releases are distros that update every part of the system as new updates are dropped. Examples are Arch, Manjaro, Debian using it's testing branch. Now, in theory, this is the least stable system because your living on the edge in terms of new features and updates being dropped and updated regularly. In the case of Arch, this IS a real threat. However: In the case of other distros like Manjaro or Debian Testing, the threat is minimal, because the devs have a vetting process before they drop software updates. This is not to say that bugs can't get through. Last year there was a Firefox snafu for manjaro that fucked up everyone's Firefox install for 3 days. But that is a very rare occurrence. But on the other hand, if your using brand new hardware, like the newest Ryzens, or a brand new 40xx Nvidia, a rolling release is a godsend because a point release distro may take (literally) years to catch up and use your hardware correctly. I actually left Mint at the time when the Nvidia 1060 was the current card, because the older Kernel and Drivers offered with it made my system crash nonstop, where I did not have that issue using a newer Arch based distro.

I've used a TON of distros. I spent many years distro hopping. FOR ME, Manjaro is the perfect fit. I DO game which is part of the reason I want the latest updates on my system. If I HAD to use a point release distro, it would be Linux Mint for sure. But the issue with point releases is that when you DO a major OS update, in my experience, shit breaks or at least starts acting really funky. Just not worth it, for me.

[–] 0 pt

There was a YouTube scraper that was able to be used in 19.3 that couldn't be used in the higher versions. That's the main reason why I never went over. I've since been able to get around that using just my phone and an online website. I don't really use my laptop all that much but I do use it everyday just not more than an hour. I don't think I'd want to go ripping all the way to the latest version but maybe somewhere in the middle that gives me 2 years of of use before that's no longer supported. The only reason I'm really leaving 19.3 is because of that. My laptop is from 2010. I've had to add a new hard drive and I've had to add more RAM but that's it really.