WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I would also like some sort of explanation on why someone thought it was a good idea to take a Flatpak that was working perfectly fine, break it, and publish it at a higher priority to our official builds.

There is some genuine mindless behaviour here and it’s taking a nasty lawyer letter to cut through it.

I don’t know if it was said elsewhere, but in their on how to deal with removing their broken package they never mention why it existed in the first place.