WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

588

Hi kids. Welcome to another exciting episode of Fake News. Today we explain how a non-descript article paints all whites as su-PREEM-asts.

Here's our article.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/military-is-cracking-down-on-e2-80-98questionable-tattoos-e2-80-99-to-combat-extremism-here-e2-80-99s-how/ar-AAS63zn?ocid=uxbndlbing

It's fucking amazing they keep talking about "cracking down on extremists", always referring to whites yet the articles never show any evidence. The article is a bore to read. Nothing of real substance. What's interesting is Drudge's front page linking to it. Here is the link and image from the Drudge's front page: https://pic8.co/sh/pdO9I9.gif Notice that red circled area.

Doing a right click on the image (using Google Lens)

Drudge pulled an image that was first used in a 2007 article (below). Google Lens (needs some work CIA) is also pulling up a youtube channel for some gamer with the same name. Good job...get him fucked with. You can recreate the same results I have. Just right click on the image and search for it. Remember that red circle? Google shows the rest of the image. Not just the shitty cut and paste job the gay intern at Drudge posted.

https://katu.com/news/local/white-supremacist-gangs-clout-grows-as-anothers-fades-11-26-2015

Summary: We have an article that does not link to one instance of white supremacy in the military. The only "attacks" are a muslim and black man (MSN is hoping the average reader doesn't research those), with the sending page using 15 year old images taken with a shitty digital camera and rehashed all over the internet. And you fuck heads in the media wonder why we think you're all full of shit.

Hi kids. Welcome to another exciting episode of Fake News. Today we explain how a non-descript article paints all whites as su-PREEM-asts. Here's our article. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/military-is-cracking-down-on-e2-80-98questionable-tattoos-e2-80-99-to-combat-extremism-here-e2-80-99s-how/ar-AAS63zn?ocid=uxbndlbing It's fucking amazing they keep talking about "cracking down on extremists", always referring to whites yet the articles never show any evidence. The article is a bore to read. Nothing of real substance. What's interesting is Drudge's front page linking to it. Here is the link and image from the Drudge's front page: https://pic8.co/sh/pdO9I9.gif Notice that red circled area. Doing a right click on the image (using Google Lens) Drudge pulled an image that was first used in a 2007 article (below). Google Lens (needs some work CIA) is also pulling up a youtube channel for some gamer with the same name. Good job...get him fucked with. You can recreate the same results I have. Just right click on the image and search for it. Remember that red circle? Google shows the rest of the image. Not just the shitty cut and paste job the gay intern at Drudge posted. https://katu.com/news/local/white-supremacist-gangs-clout-grows-as-anothers-fades-11-26-2015 Summary: We have an article that does not link to one instance of white supremacy in the military. The only "attacks" are a muslim and black man (MSN is hoping the average reader doesn't research those), with the sending page using 15 year old images taken with a shitty digital camera and rehashed all over the internet. And you fuck heads in the media wonder why we think you're all full of shit.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Please do. It really should be there. I have been trying to be better about using the correct subs

[–] 0 pt

Please do. It really should be there. I have been trying to be better about using the correct subs

Done.