WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

293

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts (edited )

What i find interesting is they have never attempted to calculate what the value for natural climate change is supposed to be. They merely conclude all change is man made which means they believe the earths environment is a static system. If they make such a charlatan assumption i can only conclude they are full of shit because all records of earths environment prove to even a causal observer it is not static. So in order for them to even reason about man made climate change they first have to be able to show that human climate change is a delta between whatever the temperature was supposed to be vs what it actually was. They never managed to predict those initial values.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

During the obama reign at one of the climate events he stated or the msm stated after that if the west went to zero emissions it would effect the temperature buy .1 to .001 degrees and that would make a huge difference. They were mocked and the info was memory holed.

The only reason I remember is because my crazy sister in law who believes anything they say but now drives a Dodge Charger with straight pipes was all for zero emissions.

I asked her if she’d be able to tell the difference between 70 degrees and 70.1-70.001 degrees and then we laughed at her.