WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

The article accuses Torba of allowing threats of violence, Which real threats of violence are allowed on Gab? It accuses Torba of allowing doxing. Who is allowed to dox whom? The article complains that there are extremists on Gab, which is a direct consequence of Gab being a free speech platform. All in all, the article is the usual whining that Gab doesn't censor enough.

> The article accuses Torba of allowing threats of violence, Which real threats of violence are allowed on Gab? It accuses Torba of allowing doxing. Who is allowed to dox whom? The article complains that there are extremists on Gab, which is a direct consequence of Gab being a free speech platform. All in all, the article is the usual whining that Gab doesn't censor enough.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Torba has previously asked people to report glownigger posts and to not engage with accounts encouraging glownigger topics.

As expected, the glownigger use their own posts to claim gab is dangerous. All they confirm is glowniggers are extremely dangerous (see treasonous j6 glowniggers as proof).

[–] 1 pt

100%. these leftists are the kings of creating circular logic. they understand the tactic well and know the vast majority are too retarded to dive into the original claim or grasp the larger picture that someone who wants to manipulate you would go to these kinds of lengths.