WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

But of course.

But of course.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Yes, and I said I agreed that’s what they were doing. But there’s nothing about this post to indicate that that’s what he was trying to say.

At face value, this looks like no one on r/news would be able to see that he was found guilty. Again, this post violated their sub rules. I know why their rules exist, but it should have been deleted even if they weren’t propagandists.

That’s my point

[–] 1 pt

At face value, this looks like no one on r/news would be able to see that he was found guilty

The only thing I see is that a post related to JS has been deleted because they don't want to have to deal with multiple ones.

It's harder to censor and more work for the soymods.

[–] 0 pt

because they don't want to have to deal with multiple ones.

Where does it say that?

All I see is “reddit deleted my post about the guilty nigger faggot”

[–] 0 pt

Where does it say that?

Try to find several JS trial posts in /r/News.

All I see is “reddit deleted my post about the guilty nigger faggot”

Isn't it the case? They deleted it because they only want to deal with the top one where they can control what is being said.