Saw this. That family is a bunch of pathetic losers to write shit like that.
Based on what we know, that man was probably obese and the vaccine may have saved his life. He's a retard who killed himself with his retarded decisions. No sympathy for him. He had choices and he chose the path that made it more probable for him to die. Now he can't live with his decisions because he's dead.
Now, if a person is super fit, eats well, takes care of themselves, and those around them, and they still die from illness, that's someone you should feel sorry for. They did everything they were supposed to and they still died through no fault of their own. Sometimes, the world sucks and you get cancer or sick and die anyway. No matter what you do. But you can do a lot to lower those chances.
The vaccine may have saved his life? it also may have given him peri or myocarditis and/or fatal blood clots, but speculation is masturbation, and an angry family who just lost someone gets a pass, unlike the obvious cunt who should know as much.
The vaccine may have saved his life?
Yes.
it also may have given him peri or myocarditis and/or fatal blood clots,
Statistically, almost completely impossible. I’ve read the studies, the studies do not support the absolutely retarded hysterical bullshit that people like you believe. We are talking 12/100,000K vs 7/100,00K. Even then, there are other confounding variable‘s which could explain the differences. I did a lengthy write up and posted it here on this site.
Stop believing retarded bullshit.
My neighbor, the one w/ the stroke...he says fuck your statistical ruboff. So you regurged some numbers provided by nobody with an agenda, right? Good for you. The vaccine is more dangerous to me personally than the disease ever was.
He's a retard who killed himself with his retarded decisions. Sometimes, the world sucks and you get cancer or sick and die anyway.
Pick one and only one, fuckwit.
You just created a false dichotomy.
That’s a logical fallacy.
Both can exist at the same time. Without contradicting each other.
If you smoke and then die of lung cancer, it’s possible that you died of lung cancer completely unrelated to smoking. But probably not.
(post is archived)