You are a free man, do what you want.
But.
We MUST get our people trained up to understand warfare in multiple dimensions. Everyone things that war is purely physical, and ultimately it is. But the bulk of warfare is psychological and that dimension of warfare has MANY MANY MANY layers to it.
For example, if you want to silently take over an enemy, you first realize that all culture is downstream from genetics. While you cannot do much about the genetics (let's ignore the mrna technology for the purposes of this conversation) what you can control is various aspects of culture. So what you do is infiltrate all of the media of your target host culture and slowly start changing the content and the philosophical underpinning of the content that media produces. Next, you move on to academia and start inserting ideas, new language and redefining existing ideas and existing language into new forms and over the course of maybe 2 or 3 overlapping generations (that is all that it takes) you have conquered your enemy because you have managed to get your enemies children to think the thoughts you want them to think, believe in the philosophy you want them to believe and use the language you want them to use.
The word TOXIC is one of these EXPLICITLY DESIGNED linguistic kill shots designed to get our people to do the following:
1) Toxic is NOT a masculine word. It is a feminine word that basically means "you are being mean to me, I am too fucking stupid and too fucking weak to stand up for my self and spit venom right back in your face so I will slink away into a corner, cry and call you toxic".
It is EXPLICITLY DESIGNED to get our white males to use white female terminology.
2) The reason this word is DESIGNED and inserted into our language is to EMASCULATE our white males. The MOMENT you start using the word toxic, you have signalled to the outside world that you are weak, that you cannot stand up for your self and you cannot spit venom.
3) But, more importantly, there is a secondary effect to the signalling you are doing to the outside world. Because of the way our brains are wired, we are all susceptible to the PINK ELEPHANT problem. Most people think the pink elephant is just the notion that us being visual creatures means that we can (for free) insert visuals into other peoples minds just by using language carefully. Every time I say pink elephant you see a pink elephant in your brain. What NO ONE tells you is that the pink elephant problem has a secondar and more insidious effect: it PUSHED OUT IDEAS OUT OF YOUR HEAD. Because of the way human conciousness wetware works, it can only ever really deal with one idea at a time. We might remember multiple ideas but you have to serially process them one at a time. WHENEVER I say pink elephant, not only am I putting an image into your head for free, I AM NOW PUSHING OUT OTHER IDEAS OUT OF YOUR HEAD AND OCCUPYING PHYSICAL NEURONS IN YOU FUCKING BRAIN.
That is a small lesson on WHY YOU MUST STOP using their fucking language.
We are under attack.
We must get lean, strong and smart.
Stop using their language, stop propagating parasitic ideas designed to make us weak.
You faggot.
How about calling them fuckwits? Because that's what they are.
In my estimation, that word isn't part of their narrative and isn't feminized. It is aggressive and forward pointing.
What is interesting is that your suggestion points out that I might be also acting as a language gatekeeper and now I feel a bit weird about that. No one voted for me to do that and gatekeeping is antithetical to the pursuit of freedom.
I'm not sure how I feel about my position now, I will have to think about it.
I just want to arm our people with analytical tools so they understand how language and culture is being used against them and how they can unwittingly propagate this poison to everyone else in their community.
I appreciate the counter point.
(post is archived)