Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

878

I know that there are more important things on a platform than that, but this is still worth mentioning.

Low resolution raster graphics for page elements, which a 10-year-old could replicate as vectorized graphics using InkScape, tend to look not-so-nice.

Not that it would bother me much, but a mature website in 2020 should really be using vector graphics.

But:

Poal.co uses vector graphics!

Poal for the win.

I know that there are more important things on a platform than that, but this is still worth mentioning. Low resolution raster graphics for page elements, which a 10-year-old could replicate as vectorized graphics using InkScape, tend to look not-so-nice. Not that it would bother me much, but a mature website in 2020 should really be using vector graphics. But: # **Poal.co uses vector graphics!** Poal for the win.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (6).
[–] • 4 pts

Pfft, vector is shit. Raytraced logos, buttons when?

[–] • 3 pts

Raytraced logos

I think portable devices that run on batteries won't appreciate that.

[–] • 1 pt

Sessile devices master race!

[–] • 0 pt

It's better for logos to be rasterized, especially if they are complex and kept at scale 1:1 anyway

Vector graphics are usually lighter when it comes to diskspace/bandwidth, but they come at a real time "computational price"

https://cf.ppt-online.org/files1/slide/0/05vysIepSblWCMu2GftD8F1NqOLEiA4orHUY3RcZVz/slide-7.jpg

Also, when it comes to svg, it's a security fuckfest/nightmare, but that's not relevant here

...

Ideally you make vector based logos and you export to bitmap