k, explain the screencap.
also yes his site is a security risk, by his own admission. he admits and brags about tracking visitor IPs, holding them up against known hacker databases, and doxxing who he finds
or apparently doxxing whoever the fuck he wants to, if srayzie is any indication
Why are you terrified of his site? There is no tracking on it, you liar.
Also you are lying about when he said he did or didn't post his site and are seemingly unaware of the thread the drama started in.
So, you can't get your story straight and you don't even know which site is accused of being a security risk because you never bithered to check the source to see if it relly tracks anyone. Spoiler alert, your friends lied about that too and you are spreading their lies.
Facial recognition has nothing to do with IP addresses, so youre fucking caught lying some more.
Looks like youre just another pedophile piece of shit shill.
Everyone knows you solicit underage material.
FYI, web was saying his links werent posted in Pizzagate. is building a strawman and is pretending like web would never link his site anywhere.
nigger, you fucking glow.
That idiot is far worse than you realize. It isn't worth being caught up in his drama, unless you can slam him with a ton of prior proof of his insanity. That guide to forum spies pins him down. He's a sophist bullshitter, relying on pilpul and lies (omission, half-truths, DARVO, twisting points, and just straight up fabrication). You'll never get honest debate from him. The one great thing that can be said of him is that he somehow always finds a way to absolutely undermine his allies. Take for instance the fact he leads the pedo hunts on Voat, and yet is a CP solicitor.
Saved evidence:
https://voat .co/v/gaming/3142139/17853963
https://voat .co/v/ProtectVoat/3145382/17890762
Still searching for the comment where he defended it as provocative argumentation.
The post made by the ban all VPNs alt, beastofbalthazar, is important to observe for multiple reasons. TOO used pilpul to avoid defining CP in order to continue his attacks, and I pressured him into providing a definition, albeit very poor. When I told him pictures of naked kids was also covered under CP, he interpreted and twisted it into a delusion that I believed it was legal. The OP of that post was likely an alt of TOO due to its observed inactivity pattern, the post being those two vs. almost everybody, and the most damning is that the TOO tried fulfilling the giant leap from step 4 to step 5.
His tantrum after being cornered:
Some prior shitstirring prior to accusing Maggotbait88 of posting malware, accusing Thelma of posting malware, and whiteknighting when Srayzie went crazy:
From Obrezhttps://archive.is/MHMx6 experience, sguevar on TOOs https://archive.is/P3QU9 lack of objectivity, MadWorld https://archive.is/53gK2 suspicious links research results and the https://voat .co/v/ProtectVoat/3005178 spergout.
And remember...
18 U.S. Code § 2252. Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors
(post is archived)