Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

seems petty and dishonest to me. seems like he's being targeted as a user by site admin

EDIT: automatic tag flagging? no manual review? faith in auto-algorithms? y'all are fucking glowniggers! turn off automatic, and go for manual review, you dingus. every fucking shill ever can and will exploit the system to label innocent users

seems petty and dishonest to me. seems like he's being targeted as a user by site admin EDIT: automatic tag flagging? no manual review? faith in auto-algorithms? y'all are fucking glowniggers! turn off automatic, and go for manual review, you dingus. every fucking shill ever can and will exploit the system to label innocent users

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (47).
[–] • 6 pts (edited )

Yes, this is all clearly a big, super serious plot! We're an evil hive of doxxers!

Edit: The suspicious behavior tag has existed for months and you said nothing.

[–] • 0 pt

crensh didnt have it applied to him last time i checked, and now its there, would someone like to fucking explain that?

[–] • 4 pts

It's assigned by an algorithm due to the algorithm detecting certain behaviors, hon.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

i heard it was nano tech thru the food

[–] • -1 pt (edited )

2 words

shill exploitation

A.set shillbots onto a target

B. kick them below a certain threshold

C. innocent users now labeled suspicious

why the fuck is that even automated if shills can it exploit is so damn hard? thats the most retarded fucking shit ive seen in planning, ever.

why the fuck does poal have such a glaring loophole sitting there to be exploited by? fix it and turn it off then