>The only thread I read related to crensch and pmyb2 was on related to crensch asking for a user here to be banned for actions of the user on another site, I think it was doxxing and voat. I was invited here by a user that doxxed and continues to try to doxx users on another site. And may or may not have dropped a continued doxx on this site, but didn't link it to that username so nothing can be done, as far as I can tell. >crensch did not like the answer and there was more back and forth; I'm sure crensch was not delighted at not getting what he wanted Nonsense. Once it was fully explained to me, I was quite delighted. All I ask for is consistency, and once we stopped talking past each other, PMYB2 explained his position and what could or could not happen. >And in the crensch thread asking for a user to be banned, pmyb2 did not call crensch any derogatory terms in that thread (looks like I'm special -- my mom was right !) I don't quite understand this. In my entire username's history on Voat, I've never given two fucks about derogatory terms, and use them liberally myself when I choose to. >I say, fuck-em ! Don't be asking to ban someone without merit. Oh, but there was. And if the lines were drawn ever so slightly differently, TWOS would not be here. Which is fine, because I like that line right where it is, I was merely under the impression it was in another place. >Not saying to ban crensch but I would not take anything he says with any veracity...he's quick to complain about stuff that occurred elsewhere Like TWOS did in his thread that got multiple upvotes despite being nothing but claim after unsupported claim? I can verify my claims. I bet you're one of those that can't, and that's why you don't like what I have to say. >nor do I wish to read any more "books" written by him of series of links that lead the reader to the conclusion that this user is trying to dictate what happens here due to what happens somewhere else. Books? Responding to every point of his is a "book"? Your attention span is rather short, isn't it? >If he wishes to continue on with his attack of a voat user who may be banned over there, he should petition the voat admin to re-instate that user's voat account so that the arguments can continue there, where it should happen, if anywhere. I quite understand the playing field here, and I'll be sure to ping you when I wreck TWOS for not supporting his claims, going forward. >I don't have access to the voat forum and luckily would not see this drama queen any further, hopefully. We're going to be the best of friends, you and me.