a user claimed something legally, phrasing it in such a way he defended one of the pedos on voat.
i dared him to post the thing he said was legal according to the books, if that type of content was A-ok
he didnt post that shit for obvious reasons but it still means the cunt failed to defend his point with actual action
the voat pedos that were being hunted at the time then wrote the character assassination script they did, in order to try and destroy me before i caught them. they failed.
your fucking users believe lies and falsehoods. they keep laying charges at my feet that are not the case in reality. i keep denying these charges because the charges are fucking bollocks.
You could always come on the podcast and explain and defeat. You won't though.
what defeat? ive stated truth.
ive been busy with IRL shit as ive said, i heard about you wanting to talk on mumble, but you know what? you get to sit in the fucking back burner while i get important shit done instead. you've been assholes, and i don't give first priority to assholes
also, maybe you should tell that if he continues being a slander-spreading ass, i might decide that the ceasefire is too boring, and then maybe i set poal alight all over again.
I'll be there Sunday September the 8th. I don't respond well to pathetic impotent faggots. Let us "talk it out" Mr. Internet Badass. Invite crensch too but explain he can't just be a nigger and will have to wait his turn.
How do you always twist things so that they're always the opposite of what they initially were?
When cameracode asked you to define what CP was, you tried avoiding to answer his question. I pestered you past all your pilpul because I rightly assumed that you changed your definition of it as you saw fit, like how a SJW redefines racism. Eventually you defined it as pictures of kids getting fucked, and got pissed when I told you it was inadequate. And because your feelings determine your delusional interpretation of reality, you decided that me telling you that CP also includes pictures of naked kids meant that I supported it as legal.
Imagine trying to casually entice someone into posting CP because you can't read and think it's a reasonable win condition for an argument.
Oh yeah, you didn't go after Dortex or Faggotbait until both called you out for begging for pictures of naked kids. Just because you proved they were nasty doesn't mean their accusations towards you magically become false.
Oh yeah, you didn't go after Dortex or Faggotbait until both called you out for begging for pictures of naked kids.
bullshit, also dortex/faggotbait is 1 combined user, and also a pedophile i busted. he tried this shit on me for 9-10 months and fucking failed
here's a massive mega-post of proof:
https://poal.co/s/MeanwhileOnVoat/88785
dortex/faggotbait is a fucking pedophile who says he's fucked kids as young as 6. they are not innocent.
that pedo-faggot was the one driving the slander AND ALSO you got banned for vote manipulation for helping him!
you claim i didnt fight pedos before aged, got proof?
In any case, Aged was/is a perverted weirdo over there.
this all started from opposing aged. i fight pedophiles.
not only that, decidueye was outted by voat systems as a vote manipulator alt during that time, and got banned for it. he was propping up a separate (?) loli-pedo
(post is archived)