In that comment section where you solicited CP, you were asked by cameracode to define child pornography. When you initially failed to do so, I hounded through your pilpul because I assumed your definition of CP changes as you see fit, like how SJWs redefine racism to their own manipulative ends. You defined it as pictures of kids getting fucked, and I told you such a definition was inadequate. You got pissed and I replied that federal CP laws included pictures of naked kids. Because you only read what you want to see and view communication as a means of manipulation, you decided that soliciting CP I never had or will have was a great idea.
please explain what other reason Aged the fucking pedophile would have for posting pictures of children besides CP.
his posted photos went to a sub named "jailbait", they had porn titles featuring name and age, and all of them depicted children.
please explain how thats not CP trying to slip past the legal radar.
Shouldn't you be asking Putt this instead of irrationally interrogating me? I've explained on Voat before Aged purposely toes the line, bending rules to their utmost while never breaking them. It's called breaking the spirit of the law but not the letter of.
Shouldn't you be asking Putt this instead of irrationally interrogating me?
no.
im asking you.
(post is archived)