Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

•

Hidden policies Warning: Apparently, Metapedia ain't much better than Wikipedia in terms of admin culture. (wikipediasucks.co)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (5).

[–] • 0 pt

But they only have five active editors and require paid registrations, which hinders their growth.

parent
link

/s/ModAbuse

View this sub's wiki

created ago

About this sub

Hall of shame

A rank list of the most hostile and/or irresponsible known moderators and administrators.

~~Bbb23 (Wikipedia)~~]
Jason Scott (ArchiveTeam)
Ani625 (Reddit)
Westwall (Metapedia)
DrinkMoreCodeMore (/r/Onions)
relentlessflame (AnimeSuki forums)
MetaCritic moderators
Adrian Isén (social media)
NinjaRobotPirate (Wikipedia)
RobertJ (MozillaZine forums)

Quick navigation

Stories of misbehaving moderators and administrators from all around the Internet.

Welcome!

The Internet sadly has an abundance of communities with ruthless and hostile moderators and administrators who behave irresponsibly, harm their own cause, abuse their powers and oppress innocent users without recourse.

We strive to make the Internet more peaceful and productive by exposing those who perpetuate hostility.

Have you witnessed moderator or adminisrator of an online community doing any of things?

You are not alone. This is the right place to share your story!

We listen to your grievances.

Uncover misconduct and help making the internet more peaceful.

Help your friends too by sharing and try out

Guidelines:

Follow these guidelines in order to provide the best possible experience to fellow users of this community.

Posts that are not safe for work (“NSFW”) must be marked as such in the submission form.
No internal hostility or victim blaming: Devaluing any legitimate criticism by labelling it “whining”, “tears”, “bitching”, “crying”, “wailing”, “snowflake”, “butthurt” or in other dismissive ways is strongly discouraged here, in order to provide a warm, safe and welcoming space to those who share their stories and grievances. Thanks for understanding.
- Instead: You may constructively, logically and sincerely criticize the poster, which provides value instead of discouragement.
- Exposing Internet hostility actually is quite the contrary: Courageful. Knowing in advance where to avoid hostility is beneficial to fellow Internet users.
- But shaming abusive mods/admins (i.e. for venting) is encouraged.
No disruptive spam or vandalism.
Swearing for venting and emphasis: Allowed, but it is recommended to put profane language into spoiler tags ``. The contents of spoiler tags will be revealed upon hovering above it with the mouse cursor or tapping on it.
Self-promotion is allowed if it adds value.
Contrary to the name _“ModAbuse”_, you are also welcome to expose hostile users that are non- or former moderators and/or administrators, because it also helps readers circumventing online hostility.
Obviously, apply.
- E.g. Zero doxxing, even if you really despise who you are exposing. Only mention personal information (e.g. full name) if it is already consentfully public.

And last but not least:

Be fair.

Please don't accuse moderators or administrators of things they actually didn't do, even if you despise them.

Tips:

To help readers understand your situation, consider these tips when posting:

Use a for your post.
We recommend you to answer the following questions in your post. Not mandatory, but encouraged:
- Why do you think the moderators or administrators acted like they did?
- Are you the only user they did this to, or other users too?
Flair your posts after submission for categorization.
Recommendation: Keep an evident record of misbehaving moderators and administrators by using web archival services such as and . Include them in your posts and comments.
Be logically comprehensive.
Be open-minded.
Assume good faith, be civil and respectful to fellow users.
Embrace constructive criticism.
Communicate as sincerely as possible.
Speak in a moderate tone and avoid UPPERCASE SCREAMING.
Uncovering is encouraged.
If multiple flairs apply (e.g. “Verbal abuse”, “Personal attacks” and “Suppression” simultaneously), then choose whichever flair you consider more prelevant, but mention the other points in your post's text.
You may crosspost from other subverses and external websites, but if needed, add elaborative information using a text post, or per additional pinned comment.
Feel free to also expose social media misconducts of individuals. Use the “Social media misconduct” or “Social media block” flair for it.
Share updates on past reports using the Update flair or by adding comments to the original post.
Links you already visited show up in light green (and purple inside comments).

Feedback / Meta

For Feedback and discussion about this subverse, add one of the respective “Feedback” and “Meta” flairs.

Constructive criticism is welcome.

Ask questions about this subverse using the “Question” flair.

Coming soon:

(if Poal.co introduces this feature).

Flair list

Help categorizing posts by adding a flair to it.

Currently available flairs:

Feedback
Question
Hall of Shame candidate
Verbal abuse
Suppression
Personal attacks
Cancel culture
Bbb23
Social media block
Gaslighting
Corruption
Observation
Cyber bullying
Tone policing
Blame shifting
Scapegoating
Misleading
Social media misconduct
Hypocrisy
Double standards
Dishonesty
Ignorance
Cognitive dissonance
Deletionism
Thoughts
Update
Hostile attitude
Hall-of-shame award
Stigmatization
Hostile community
Logic fails
False trolling accusations
Censorship
Arrogance
Essay
Hidden policies
Random bad acting
Minor misstep
Narcissism
Memes
Joke
Examples
Derangement syndrome
Criticism intolerance
Tyranny

That's right. Bbb23 behaved so excessively obnoxious that he is a category of his own.

CSS of this subverse (and , , and ) designed by .