This is yet another of abusive moderators, which is often used in combination with fishing and ban traps:
They accuse the user of misconduct in non-obvious cases, e.g. Westwall of Metapedia (see Rank 4) accusing a user of misconduct for adding a factually correct category to a page.
When the user reasonably and politely asked Westwall for an explanation to avoid repeating the alleged mistake in future, we all know what happened:
bEcAuSE I SaID sO
. . and then the user got banned for a month.
Watch out for cancer moderators using gaslighting practices.
And if an administrator sides with an abusive moderator, let that community rot and join one that takes users seriously (e.g. Poal.co).
This is yet another [common practice](/p/150834) of abusive moderators, which is often used in combination with fishing and ban traps:
They accuse the user of misconduct in non-obvious cases, e.g. Westwall of Metapedia (see Rank 4) accusing a user of misconduct for adding a factually correct category to a page.
When the user **reasonably and politely** asked Westwall for an explanation **to avoid repeating the alleged mistake in future**, we all know what happened:
> **bEcAuSE I SaID sO**
. . and then the user got banned for a month.
----
Watch out for cancer moderators using gaslighting practices.
And if an administrator sides with an abusive moderator, let that community rot and join one that takes users seriously (e.g. Poal.co).
(post is archived)