WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Mank (2020) is about Herman Manckiewicz (jew, don’t know or care how to spell the last name), the silent partner co-author of Orson Welles’ Citizen Kane. The lead is played by the previously-perceived “Republican” Gary Oldman, a talented actor.

The film was marketed as the story behind the story of Citizen Kane, when in reality, it is (((Hollywood’s))) love letter to its own history of socialist propagandizing. The film paints “Mank” as a frustrated idealist artist who struggles with his whiskey-drowned conscience in the early 30s as WR Hearst fought the electoral campaign of shitty, sensationalist, lying commie “journalist” Upton Sinclair.

It paints the actually powerful Louis B (who wanted Shirley temple to suck his tiny jew cock) Mayer of MGM as a hapless pawn, his studio “at the mercy” of the capitalist robber baron Hearst and the wealthy “(implied white) bankers and industrialists out East.” Hearst using his power over Mayer making anti-communist/Sinclair “propaganda” in the run up to the California gubernatorial election. And Mank’s attempts at “bravery” fighting the “system” (a system of which there were plenty of villains, virtually all jews, himself one of them).

As a fan of the medium of film, and appreciating the work of Citizen Kane, I was, not surprisingly, disappointed. In all, it’s what I’ve come to expect nowadays from Hollywood, even if it came via an unfortunate misdirection.

Mank (2020) is about Herman Manckiewicz (jew, don’t know or care how to spell the last name), the silent partner co-author of Orson Welles’ Citizen Kane. The lead is played by the previously-perceived “Republican” Gary Oldman, a talented actor. The film was marketed as the story behind the story of Citizen Kane, when in reality, it is (((Hollywood’s))) love letter to its own history of socialist propagandizing. The film paints “Mank” as a frustrated idealist artist who struggles with his whiskey-drowned conscience in the early 30s as WR Hearst fought the electoral campaign of shitty, sensationalist, lying commie “journalist” Upton Sinclair. It paints the actually powerful Louis B (who wanted Shirley temple to suck his tiny jew cock) Mayer of MGM as a hapless pawn, his studio “at the mercy” of the capitalist robber baron Hearst and the wealthy “(implied white) bankers and industrialists out East.” Hearst using his power over Mayer making anti-communist/Sinclair “propaganda” in the run up to the California gubernatorial election. And Mank’s attempts at “bravery” fighting the “system” (a system of which there were plenty of villains, virtually all jews, himself one of them). As a fan of the medium of film, and appreciating the work of Citizen Kane, I was, not surprisingly, disappointed. In all, it’s what I’ve come to expect nowadays from Hollywood, even if it came via an unfortunate misdirection.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I can't watch any new movie from pedowood, it's horrible multicultural propaganda with niggers and faggots.

[–] 0 pt

Well said, 100% on target.