Having read the 4th Turning (referenced in article) I can say I'm not impressed with the article; or the book. The book assumes a natural course of human existence creates a cycle to human events. A continuous rise and fall of civilizations. It completely ignores that many of the named events are caused by Jewish controls of power.
Now one can assume this is society by Jews and its the way they function - cyclic destruction (a "Shiva"). But I'm not prepared to make that argument. Regardless, if it's not a natural cycle it means its prognostic ability is limited or zero. A non-organic pattern doesn't ensure indefinite continuation.
Having read the 4th Turning (referenced in article) I can say I'm not impressed with the article; or the book. The book assumes a natural course of human existence creates a cycle to human events. A continuous rise and fall of civilizations. It completely ignores that many of the named events are caused by Jewish controls of power.
Now one can assume this is society by Jews and its the way they function - cyclic destruction (a "Shiva"). But I'm not prepared to make that argument. Regardless, if it's not a natural cycle it means its prognostic ability is limited or zero. A non-organic pattern doesn't ensure indefinite continuation.
(post is archived)