Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

Ismay wants to “break the will” - his words - of people who rely on gasoline to power their cars and oil and natural gas to heat their homes, in order to “combat climate change.” “Sixty percent of our emissions come from residential heating and passenger vehicles,” Ismay told an audience gathered to hear him expostulate – using the royal “our” as collectivists reflexively do when they mean to say everyone except themselves, especially when it comes to having wills broken. He went on to say that these “emissions” – of the dread inert gas carbon dioxide that doesn’t create smog or cause breathing problems – “that need to be reduced” – the assertion is taken as established fact – “come from you, the person on your street, the senior on fixed income.”

No matter what it takes, no matter what it costs.

He described “turn(ing) the screws” . . . in order to “break (the) will” of such deplorables. That is to say, the desire of the deplorables to resist being impoverished – and frozen – by well-paid-by-those-who-are-forced-to-pay-them government workers such as himself.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/break-their-will

Ismay wants to “break the will” - his words - of people who rely on gasoline to power their cars and oil and natural gas to heat their homes, in order to “combat climate change.” “Sixty percent of our emissions come from residential heating and passenger vehicles,” Ismay told an audience gathered to hear him expostulate – using the royal “our” as collectivists reflexively do when they mean to say everyone except themselves, especially when it comes to having wills broken. He went on to say that these “emissions” – of the dread inert gas carbon dioxide that doesn’t create smog or cause breathing problems – “that need to be reduced” – the assertion is taken as established fact – “come from you, the person on your street, the senior on fixed income.” No matter what it takes, no matter what it costs. He described “turn(ing) the screws” . . . in order to “break (the) will” of such deplorables. That is to say, the desire of the deplorables to resist being impoverished – and frozen – by well-paid-by-those-who-are-forced-to-pay-them government workers such as himself. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/break-their-will

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (66).
[–] • 2 pts

pretty wicked stuff, but that's to be expected from sinful humans. we are living in modern roman times in which our elites are trying to fill the role of nero and they are succeeding

the populace at large is egotist, only lives for the next pleasurable meal, sex or entertainment. we are going the way the roman empire the question that arises is are we going to be split in to obsolesce or are we going to get our asses "pompeii'ed"

[–] • 1 pt

Split and then conquered I think. China wants a piece of North American pie for the raw resources that this land has. Splitting up of the USA and invasion is whats on the future of America. The spirit of this country I think is almost dead. Every day the injustice is tolerated and normalized is a day that hope fades.

We always hear the strong men from hard times trope, but hard times consume quite a bit of life, and nature dictates who the strong really are.

[–] • 0 pt

i'm sorry but i find that too hard to believe because if they really wanted space and raw materials then they would want a piece of the russian pie. since russia is the largest country in the world. eastern russia is pretty much inhabited to boot as well

now, if you tell me that they want to conquer us in order to achieve world supremacy then yeah that's a possibility. but in reality the illuminati seeks to destroy 1/3 of the world population and america doesnt even have 500 million yet.

so am suspicious of all these talk about they wanting to eliminate most of the u.s population. it just doesnt make sense whatsoever. we arent even the most populous christian nation. guess what nation is that?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )