No, it doesn't. You're confusing Marxism with Christianity.
Look at history. Thousands of years of dominant Christian history confirms this qoute. The past hundred years have been dominated by jews.
The roman empire and it's remaining institution (the roman catholic church) were globalist projects. They were highly expansionist, cosmopolitan and did their level best to erase distinct nations wherever they spread. They also used exactly the same attack vectors as marxism, namely corrupting local leaders by offering them more power and building a subversive army of outcasts by taking the bottom layer of society and promising them status.
Europe already had strong nations, europe already had a martial culture, europe already had distinct racial identities. Christianity did not create those things, it abused them and gradually eroded them.
The vikings were expansionists. The Mongols were expansionists. What pagan tribe wasn't going to war with other tribes, or making other pagan tribes people their slaves or raping other pagan tribes people? Pagan tribes erased other pagan tribes, hence the Anglo-Saxons. Hence the extinction of many other ancient European tribes.
You're conflating pagan Rome with the Holy Roman Empire. Rome was a pagan empire that had already encompassed most of Europe before Rome became Christian. So, the belief that Christian came in after the pagans to erase everyone's ethnic identity when the pagans were already doing that makes no sense why you would blame Christians. Europe became Europe due to Christianity. Western civilization was formed by Christianity.
Thousands of years of history shows that Christianity respected ethnic differences hence all the nations of Europe that were formed under a Christian Europe. Pagans didn't care about other ethnic groups or tribes. If they got in their way they killed, robbed, and raped their women.
What pagan tribe wasn't going to war with other tribes, or making other pagan tribes people their slaves or raping other pagan tribes people?
I never suggested expansionism was uniquely christian trait. The Romans were expansionist globalists before they became christian, christianity just turned out to be a very useful meme when it came to encouraging their subjects to bend the knee.
Same with the globalists and marxism, they've found the perfect tool to portray subjugation as virtuous. I have no doubt that even if the globalists somehow lose, the same marxist memes will stick around encouraging subjugation until the next imperator shows up, which is exactly why we have to show zero tolerance for that kind of slavish atitude.
So, the belief that Christian came in after the pagans to erase everyone's ethnic identity when the pagans were already doing that makes no sense
See above. I'm not making that claim, I'm pointing out that christianity was a perfect tool to aid the Romans in that goal. It encouraged their subject populations to knuckle down and be meek in exchange for rewards in the hereafter. And their ruling class got even more power plus benefits in the hereafter in exchange for enforcing the Christian monopoly.
Thousands of years of history shows that Christianity respected ethnic differences hence all the nations of Europe that were formed under a Christian Europe.
There is a difference between respecting ethnic differences and doing your best to erase them. Christendom was the original EUSSR.
Pagans didn't care about other ethnic groups or tribes.
Correct. They cared about their own tribe and ethnic group. Which is exactly how it should be.
Incidentally I'm tolerating the term "pagan" here out of convenience. It's so broad a term it's practically useless since it includes religions like buddhism which also propose universal brotherhood.
(post is archived)