Prosecuting someone that a judge has determined there was probable cause to warrant is not a rights violation. If the prosecutor lied about evidence at a probable cause hearing, that would be one thing, but trying to get a conviction on a weak case is not going to be grounds for a prosecutor getting pinched.
Prosecuting someone that a judge has determined there was probable cause to warrant is not a rights violation. If the prosecutor lied about evidence at a probable cause hearing, that would be one thing, but trying to get a conviction on a weak case is not going to be grounds for a prosecutor getting pinched.
Say it with me, Malicious prosecution. The fact a crime exists invalidates your position in its entirety. That's why it exists.
Say it with me, Malicious prosecution. The fact a crime exists invalidates your position in its entirety. That's why it exists.
Malicious prosecution is a civil suit, usually not very successful, and is awarded when it is found out that there was no actual probable cause.
Malicious prosecution is a civil suit, usually not very successful, and is awarded when it is found out that there was no actual probable cause.
(post is archived)