He spends half the article praising MLK, and the other half denouncing marxists. MLK was a Marxist. He had several jewish communist handlers who did everything for him. Most of the shit we're dealing with now is a direct growth from the laws passed in the 60's, like welfare and affirmative action. If MLK was so good, why is every street named after him a murder alley? The main difference between a "conservative" and a "racist" is that the latter knows how to read.
He spends half the article praising MLK, and the other half denouncing marxists. MLK was a Marxist. He had several jewish communist handlers who did everything for him. Most of the shit we're dealing with now is a direct growth from the laws passed in the 60's, like welfare and affirmative action. If MLK was so good, why is every street named after him a murder alley? The main difference between a "conservative" and a "racist" is that the latter knows how to read.
(post is archived)