The parents bought their kid the gun and also ignored the school's warnings.
The kid posted on social media some videos they should not have and his mother literally only commented about how he should be more careful not to gwt caught.
They even asked the parents to take the kid to aome counselling due to concerning behavior.
He posted some cryptic stuff about voices and blood everywhere.
The parents should had aborted the kid months before the shooting.
This was in the span of a day. What evidence was there for the gun in the school. Don't they have metal detectors?
They took his backpack and sent him to a counselor. CNN says they resisted taking the kid of out school. What does that mean? Was it simply, "do we have to?" The school has the power to send a kid home.
The media is trying to tie them to Trump too since they were Trump supporters to make them more hated and Trump supporters hated.
They might be shit parents but they are presumed innocent.
They will try to link any parent with a gun as a threat because of their kids.
And this is how you know that they never resisted taking the kid out of school.
Most parents do not want to take their kid out of school because they now have to take off work. If they don't have to then most parents will say no. The counselor will have to be in that trial and the question will come up whether the one drawing meant the kid needed to be sent home. Which will set a precedent that any kid who does something the school doe not like or scares them will be sent home. Remember, MAGA hats scare school officials.
BTW, I don't trust CNN. I'd want to hear it in the trial. I will give people the benefit of the doubt. To much info about these people was instantly accessible in the media but not for the Texas shooter or Christmas speedbump driver.
(post is archived)