But where do you draw the line? Who gets to decide what is a "bribe" vs what is a "donation/contribution"?
I don't draw a line. They are all bribes.
Who gets to decide which industries can use their capital to be politically active?
Whoever has the monopoly on force. If it was me, the answer would be none of them. They don't need to be politically active. They already have workers who have an economic interest in voting to protect their jobs. "What if they don't have enough American workers for that?" Some corporatist might whine. I say they don't need a say.
What do you think the solution to this kind of bullshit is?
Everyone knows what the solution is.
>But where do you draw the line? Who gets to decide what is a "bribe" vs what is a "donation/contribution"?
I don't draw a line. They are all bribes.
>Who gets to decide which industries can use their capital to be politically active?
Whoever has the monopoly on force. If it was me, the answer would be none of them. They don't need to be politically active. They already have workers who have an economic interest in voting to protect their jobs. "What if they don't have enough American workers for that?" Some corporatist might whine. I say they don't need a say.
>What do you think the solution to this kind of bullshit is?
Everyone knows what the solution is.
(post is archived)