WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

If it doesn't lead to charges and convictions, then the texas AG has essentially allowed it and endorsed it.

Actions without results, are a form of denying representation. Once you see it, you can't unsee it.

Those who deny lawful legitimate representation, who work against the fully, equal, and measured enforcement of the law? Those who do that, be they "investigations that just happened to lead no where", or officials openly using capitol police as straight political thugs?

They deserve trial and death.

If you grandstand, you deserve to be held accountable first, before the political opposition.

We're not voting for losers and traitors anymore. Thats done. The days of grandstanding and go-nowhere actions are over. The days of excuses about being blocked by the other side, are through. The days of cover ups and going after small fish, instead of major consequences for the parties, those days are burned.

There will be legal lawful representation that carries out the will of the American people, or there will be lawful legal consequences.

The failure to do so. The failure to reform. The failure in the face of outrages and massive overreach by the other party, is none other than a farce and criminal malpractice for failure to represent us. These things are radicalizing americans and citizens in other nations too.

If you work for the bureaucracy and you're reading this, we aren't tolerating this nonsense any more. We're coming for your jobs and everything you hold dear.

It can be through voting, or it can be through mass movements in the street.

We wanted to be left alone. You refuse to enforce the law against those who refuse to stop imposing on us. We wanted to live our lives. You refuse to vote on bills, and policies, or force action we demand, through the courts.

You are useless, traitors, and we hold you criminally responsible.

And while I support peace and nonviolence, if the people you have harmed, if the family of those people, visit violence on you, be they individuals, or mobs, or "terrorists", and I end up on the jury to judge them?

I will 100% exonerate them as a jury member, for harming you, for destroying your cities and property.

We have had enough.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

The judges are afraid, and the ones actually running things, not the congress or senate, or equivalents in other nations.

Thats why the judicial system has been giving us a few "wins" in the courts, to cool the public off.

It's not enough, because we know now whose responsible for allowing all the terrorism the u.s. government has engaged in, directly, and through woke wallstreet and their leftwing street thugs, for the last two decades.

We know whos responsible. Who allowed it to get this way.

Those who make the rules have no influence compared to those who rule what is legal and what isn't.

Otherwise we wouldn't be here right now.

Bush's outrages with the patriot act? Obama's outrages? Congress's mass theft, mass spying, endless wars, unlimited immigration and demographic replacement, endorsing violence in our streets, rounding up citizens for protesting?

The courts allowed it all. The judges are the ones in charge.

If congress can be pressured though, they can be forced into fighting the judicial system, because people still believe the fiction that theres actually separation of branches of government, rather than the judicial being an unelected and carefully selected group of plutocrats working for the oligarchs at blackrock, vanguard, and state street.

Force them into a position where they have to fight to maintain the illusion of legitimacy, and it will force the judicial system into temporary concessions we can build on.

Thats how this thing works.

Congress and the senate makes policies that push blackrock, vanguard, state street, and the fed banks and OSIs agenda. Congress has zero actual say in this, they just act as the front. When things get bad enough, the judicial system reigns them in. If it gets even worse, the judicial system opens up the precedent floodgate to legally prosecute and overturn the parties and congresses. it happened with the change over from the whigs for example. Maybe once every 100 years. And then we get a new set of front guys, who are completely useless and only do what they are told.

But critically the mid level and low level guys in the military, the bureaucracy, and the citizens? Many of them believe in the fiction of legitimate government and a real congress/senate.

So if forced into a position of maintaining that illusion of power, they'll be like a dog biting their master. The judicial system will be forced into a dilemma that grants us advantages we can use.

It has already happened at the small scale with the judicial walkbacks of legislative and executive overreach, just a slow steady gradual drum beat of them, along with having some of their senators and congressmen "resign" or be "overturned" in the u.s. stalinist potemkin elections, but under the right circumstances, this trend could be amplified massively.

At that point they can't vet all the people who will apply to replace them.

And then we can do some real damage to the 'parties' system produced by their political cartel.

[–] 0 pt

Is go fund me in texas?

[–] 1 pt

Washington state or california is where they're incorporated I think.

If it infringed upon their citizens, Texas can still investigate though.

[–] 0 pt

Sure, they can investigate. But without a legal or physical presence in the state, there's nothing they can do.

Realistically, other than an investigation, what do you believe can result?