Oh please fuck off with that shit. I know the difference between actual art and a Jackson Pollock. I don;t get lost in the weeds of sophistry because I have SENSE.
I know the difference between actual art and a Jackson Pollock
no, you have stuff you like and a literalist sense of what art should be defined by that preference
if other people like different stuff, does that make them wrong?
Yes. Them liking shitty stuff makes them wrong, because of their shitty taste. Subjective opinions can have objective arcs.
Or it could equally be your capacity to understand new concepts is limited by a narrower range of experiences?
I reckon the people who can appreciate Paula Rego can equally appreciate Titian,
although honestly there isn't much contemporary art I like after the 60's, it seems the market is overly saturated with interesting but not particularly outstanding ideas
(post is archived)