It's not like "why one wine is better than another," you're literally telling me that the difference between wine and shit is subjective, you silly person!
no, I'm saying the language used to describe esoteric topics is not literal
if you can't understand how art evolves its own language of expression, then you won't understand what is being presented
In other words, words fail you, so you fail to persuade me of your ridiculous position, that there is artistic merit to Jackson Pollock's splatter paintings. Gotcha. You're so much smarter than me that my Earth language of English is inadequate to describe your Brobdingnagian musings on representative art, of course.
In other words, words fail you,
no, I'm just talking to someone who wants to insert 'ohmygerd, da jews' into something where it's not relevant
If you want to dismiss everything beyond what you like right now then whatever, the world doesn't care. No one is asking you to understand anything and it's not anyone's job to show you new experiences.
Be happy you have the best potato in your village
(post is archived)