And you're opposed to it even in the cases described in the article where children have constant pain because something is wrong with their foreskin? The fuckin' morons in the article are like, "Well, that painful condition usually resolves itself by the time the kids are 17, so circumcision in unnecessary." So 17 years of suffering is better than what, two weeks of suffering after an outpatient procedure like circumcision. That's the definition of stupid. I'd argue that they're giving stupid people a bad name.
Sometimes there are conditions were we might have to ampute someone's arm or foot.
But we shouldn't do it by default.
Billions of men in europe and Asia are not circumcized. They are perfectly healthy and prefer it that way.
But I slowly get the impression you might in fact be a pedophile who wishes to harm the genitals of children. And you use rare medical conditions as an excuse for being a sicko.
But I slowly get the impression you might in fact be a pedophile who wishes to harm the genitals of children. And you use rare medical conditions as an excuse for being a sicko.
If by "slowly" you mean from your first reaction.
You are nitpicky about this kind of stuff and make personal insults against me.
But you never feel the need to clarify that you are not a pedo or that you are against causing unecessary pain in a child's genitals.
That's very telling.
(post is archived)