If USA today can name a man as women of the year, it seems perfectly acceptable to name a man as man of the year. Why not?
If USA today can name a man as women of the year, it seems perfectly acceptable to name a man as man of the year. Why not?
Actually that would be a great comeback from them. 'sorry, we mistakenly named levine man of the year, instead he will be woman of the year beating out (list of feminist icons) as we have decided he is better than all of them'
Actually that would be a great comeback from them.
'sorry, we mistakenly named levine man of the year, instead he will be woman of the year beating out (list of feminist icons) as we have decided he is better than all of them'
(post is archived)