Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

They say they have already been using significantly less water than their state allotment, and they are still going to be under the new allotment by a large amount. Yet they are still going to charge more for water in order to encourage even less water use.

People already spent time and money to use less water, so much so, they say they are fine in a drought, but are getting punished anyway. These people need new neckties.

They say they have already been using significantly less water than their state allotment, and they are still going to be under the new allotment by a large amount. Yet they are still going to charge more for water in order to encourage even less water use. People already spent time and money to use less water, so much so, they say they are fine in a drought, but are getting punished anyway. These people need new neckties.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (22).
[–] • 0 pt

Things might be different in Nevada, but when I hear these public guidelines or restrictions on water use I wonder what percentage of total use comes directly from people (toilets, showers, etc.). I read that most of California’s water is used by industry. Apparently almonds and avocados need loads of water to produce.

[–] • 2 pts

Residential water use is less than 10% of California's water use.