What a retard
What a retard
> Full disclosure: I'm a 'Baby Boomer.' Born in 1955. Some basic facts on me: [REDACTED because who cares?]
> Now, all you boomer bashers, I have a few rhetorical questions for you (and if you choose to comment, reasoned, rational dialogue welcome, however, you go vitriolic or ad hominem, your comment won't see the light of day AND you'll be banned):
- What exactly do you have against what I've described that MILLIONS of Americans of my generation did?
- What exactly have YOU done that's so much better?
- What problems have YOU solved?
> PS: When you finally have the balls to act out your 'Day of the Pillow' fantasy, you MIGHT just find that I have a .45ACP under mine....and you'll feel it...for a second, as the barrel presses against your forehead. Just sayin'....
>> Full disclosure: I'm a 'Baby Boomer.' Born in 1955. Some basic facts on me: [REDACTED because who cares?]
>> Now, all you boomer bashers, I have a few rhetorical questions for you (and if you choose to comment, reasoned, rational dialogue welcome, however, you go vitriolic or ad hominem, your comment won't see the light of day AND you'll be banned):
> * What exactly do you have against what I've described that MILLIONS of Americans of my generation did?
> * What exactly have YOU done that's so much better?
> * What problems have YOU solved?
>> PS: When you finally have the balls to act out your 'Day of the Pillow' fantasy, you MIGHT just find that I have a .45ACP under mine....and you'll feel it...for a second, as the barrel presses against your forehead. Just sayin'....
I'll bite. And, for the record, I don't believe in "collective guilt," but I am a "run the numbers" guy.
Self-righteous 'Boomer epitomizes exactly what's wrong with his generation: indignant, entitled, and unsympathetic. He was in the military during one of the the longest protracted stretches of relative peace in the twentieth century - from 1974 until what I'd assume was around 1994, since retirement occurs at twenty years, even dumping the so-called "Gulf War" into the mix. He had a job and guaranteed housing for the entirety of his "career," something that couldn't be said for most blue collar types.
Seeing that he attended a "mix" of public and private schools, it's hinted that his family was at least middle class or better, during America's most prosperous era, which puts him ahead of most. Seeing the writing on the wall of Vietnam and the draft, and noting that a cease fire had been agreed to by 1973 (just in time for his high school graduation), he opted to enlist for a better shot at avoiding the shit. He likely never ended up in a rice paddy, or else he'd have boasted about it in his self-aggrandizing preamble.
By the time he was 26, he was granted a pay increase at his guaranteed taxpayer funded employment with his taxpayer funded housing. He's oddly quite proud that in his early twenties, with an able body, he never took welfare during the era when most young men are making low wages anyway and scratching to figure out how to get into a career, something he had already been provided by Uncle Sam.
Over the next decade and a half, he likely took full advantage of whatever status was afforded him by his clean, government issued work costume... er, uniform: VA loans, discounts, etc. Based on the way he talks, he was probably even frugal with that taxpayer money he was handed for defending a desk from foes both foreign and domestic.
He raised his kids during the last couple of decades where the government hadn't ruthlessly abandoned all pretense of the boot on the necks of the people, retired from the public sector during a booming economy, and had guaranteed retirement benefits locked in by his forties. He had seen the taxpayer-provided home he'd purchased appreciate by more than double in that time, granting him sizable equity for his meager investment in the early eighties, as well. If he were even remotely clever, he'd have invested some of his surplus as well, likely yielding further benefits.
Today, he's the Conservaboomer. He gets warm fuzzies from and demands people stand for the national anthem of a country whose last truly justified war was arguably its first. He doesn't know or care that the Pledge of Allegiance was socialist rhetoric claptrap intended to promote obedience and inspire reverence toward the ever-expanding "progressive" state, or how it was repackaged during the Red Scare to include "Under God" so as to fool Christians into thinking it wasn't a prayer to the US government. He thinks voting matters when picking between pairs of curated, bank-appointed office-seekers. He believes Israel is America's greatest ally, and must be defended because Jesus would want it that way. He has no idea that the wars he endorsed during the early 21st century were fought for the benefit of Israel and her white traitor lackeys to whom they toss the scraps of wealth in the oil and other industries, and if you raise the point with him, he will argue that they're "God's people."
He doesn't care that his complacency when it came to defending the real America: freedom from impairment, actually earning your living rather than taking poorly disguised government handouts for "make work," humble foreign policy and defense, and awareness of racial realities, especially when it comes to the malice of the jew, is part of what led to the place we are today.
He instead levels a wagging finger at the generation his turned into latch-key kids. Those who suffered as their parents focused on their careers and wealth rather than bothered raising them. Ones craving familial love and affection and going largely unanswered as their mommies flooded the workplace to massage their own bloated egos, and watching as their parents divorced because they didn't "feel it" any longer. It's "their" fault that without being raised properly in two-parent, traditional households, they had no idea how to forge and retain a traditional, two-parent household.
To sum up, he's patently clueless, willfully so, and unyielding in his arrogance to hear any real arguments, leaving any reader with critical thinking skills with only one thing to say in response: "OK, Boomer."
I'll bite. And, for the record, I don't believe in "collective guilt," but I am a "run the numbers" guy.
Self-righteous 'Boomer epitomizes exactly what's wrong with his generation: indignant, entitled, and unsympathetic. He was in the military during one of the the longest protracted stretches of relative peace in the twentieth century - from 1974 until what I'd assume was around 1994, since retirement occurs at twenty years, even dumping the so-called "Gulf War" into the mix. He had a job and guaranteed housing for the entirety of his "career," something that couldn't be said for most blue collar types.
Seeing that he attended a "mix" of public and private schools, it's hinted that his family was at least middle class or better, during America's most prosperous era, which puts him ahead of most. Seeing the writing on the wall of Vietnam and the draft, and noting that a cease fire had been agreed to by 1973 (just in time for his high school graduation), he opted to enlist for a better shot at avoiding the shit. He likely never ended up in a rice paddy, or else he'd have boasted about it in his self-aggrandizing preamble.
By the time he was 26, he was granted a pay increase at his guaranteed taxpayer funded employment with his taxpayer funded housing. He's oddly quite proud that in his early twenties, with an able body, he never took welfare during the era when most young men are making low wages anyway and scratching to figure out how to get into a career, something he had already been provided by Uncle Sam.
Over the next decade and a half, he likely took full advantage of whatever status was afforded him by his clean, government issued work costume... er, uniform: VA loans, discounts, etc. Based on the way he talks, he was probably even frugal with that taxpayer money he was handed for defending a desk from foes both foreign and domestic.
He raised his kids during the last couple of decades where the government hadn't ruthlessly abandoned all pretense of the boot on the necks of the people, retired from the public sector during a booming economy, and had guaranteed retirement benefits locked in by his forties. He had seen the taxpayer-provided home he'd purchased appreciate by more than double in that time, granting him sizable equity for his meager investment in the early eighties, as well. If he were even remotely clever, he'd have invested some of his surplus as well, likely yielding further benefits.
Today, he's the Conservaboomer. He gets warm fuzzies from and demands people stand for the national anthem of a country whose last truly justified war was arguably its first. He doesn't know or care that the Pledge of Allegiance was socialist rhetoric claptrap intended to promote obedience and inspire reverence toward the ever-expanding "progressive" state, or how it was repackaged during the Red Scare to include "Under God" so as to fool Christians into thinking it wasn't a prayer to the US government. He thinks voting matters when picking between pairs of curated, bank-appointed office-seekers. He believes Israel is America's greatest ally, and must be defended because Jesus would want it that way. He has no idea that the wars he endorsed during the early 21st century were fought for the benefit of Israel and her white traitor lackeys to whom they toss the scraps of wealth in the oil and other industries, and if you raise the point with him, he will argue that they're "God's people."
He doesn't care that his complacency when it came to defending the real America: freedom from impairment, actually earning your living rather than taking poorly disguised government handouts for "make work," humble foreign policy and defense, and awareness of racial realities, especially when it comes to the malice of the jew, is part of what led to the place we are today.
He instead levels a wagging finger at the generation his turned into latch-key kids. Those who suffered as their parents focused on their careers and wealth rather than bothered raising them. Ones craving familial love and affection and going largely unanswered as their mommies flooded the workplace to massage their own bloated egos, and watching as their parents divorced because they didn't "feel it" any longer. It's "their" fault that without being raised properly in two-parent, traditional households, they had no idea how to forge and retain a traditional, two-parent household.
To sum up, he's patently clueless, willfully so, and unyielding in his arrogance to hear any real arguments, leaving any reader with critical thinking skills with only one thing to say in response: "OK, Boomer."
tl;dr
tl;dr
I’m sure it was.
I’m sure it was.
Such a juden conflict.
Such a juden conflict.
The assigning of "blame" to the Boomer on the part of the subsequent generations isn't necessarily right; we all have a responsibility to make our choices in spite of our circumstances. However, the continued obsession of the Baby Boomers with image and retaining a posture that refuses to apologize to those harmed by their choices, and a failure to recognize or acknowledge how badly they screwed up, holding their fellows and themselves accountable, is alarming, and symptomatic of their generation. It shouldn't be an "us versus them" argument. It should be a "Hey, guys, we know we fucked up. Let's work together to help make things right again, starting with saving the white race."
The assigning of "blame" to the Boomer on the part of the subsequent generations isn't necessarily right; we all have a responsibility to make our choices in spite of our circumstances. However, the continued obsession of the Baby Boomers with image and retaining a posture that refuses to apologize to those harmed by their choices, and a failure to recognize or acknowledge how badly they screwed up, holding their fellows and themselves accountable, is alarming, and symptomatic of their generation. It shouldn't be an "us versus them" argument. It should be a "Hey, guys, we know we fucked up. Let's work together to help make things right again, starting with saving the white race."
Conflict management 101, people are defensive when you blame them.
If blm came around and asked you to lick their boots and grovel or they'll murder you, would you or would refuse?
I'll assume you said refuse, because you are on here. So you understand why they would have a defensive reaction to being asked to apologize by such a belligerent and hostile group. Asking them to apologize for things out of their control (how much control do YOU have on Biden's policies and would you agree that it's your fault?) is scapegoating.
And you are not asking them to apologize for a small fuck up, you are asking them to take the blame for crashing an "Empire" and the White race. That's lunacy. You would need so much propaganda to create such a level of self-hatred, they haven't even managed to make Germans hate themselves that much.
I don't need boomers to grovel at my feet and apologize, I'm not blm. I'm not a leftist aroused by power. I'm not a mentally dysgenic individual who thrive on domination. We have no need for humiliation rituals, we need to moralize, not demoralize.
Scapegoating older Whites, fomenting revenge a narrative and going along with their mass murder fantasies is nothing but one of the branches of White genocide.
That so many people on here miss that, just proves how strong the framing and propaganda is.
Conflict management 101, people are defensive when you blame them.
If blm came around and asked you to lick their boots and grovel or they'll murder you, would you or would refuse?
I'll assume you said refuse, because you are on here. So you understand why they would have a defensive reaction to being asked to apologize by such a belligerent and hostile group. Asking them to apologize for things out of their control (how much control do YOU have on Biden's policies and would you agree that it's your fault?) is scapegoating.
And you are not asking them to apologize for a small fuck up, you are asking them to take the blame for crashing an "Empire" and the White race. That's lunacy. You would need so much propaganda to create such a level of self-hatred, they haven't even managed to make Germans hate themselves that much.
I don't need boomers to grovel at my feet and apologize, I'm not blm. I'm not a leftist aroused by power. I'm not a mentally dysgenic individual who thrive on domination. We have no need for humiliation rituals, we need to moralize, not demoralize.
Scapegoating older Whites, fomenting revenge a narrative and going along with their mass murder fantasies is nothing but one of the branches of White genocide.
That so many people on here miss that, just proves how strong the framing and propaganda is.
My meaning of "apologize" is less about them offering up niceties, and definitely not about "groveling." It's about an acknowledgement of the wrong, and more importantly, helping to solve it. This is why I said "assigning of blame" isn't the right path - we can discuss these things among ourselves, explaining what went wrong and how, but if they don't want to hear it, we can't go rubbing their noses in it - they won't respond with acceptance. Their brainwashing by the media was turning them into ego-mad credit grabbers and blame-shifters: they blamed the prior generation for their struggles, and as evidenced by even the Conservaboomer in this case, blaming the subsequent generation for the problems of today.
Accusing them directly only puts them on the defensive. They should, however, recognize the reality: they made a big chunk of this mess, and therefore want to help straighten it out. They have a lot they can still do, and less to "lose" than those still raising kids and working all day to make ends meet.
They don't have a lot of years left, and they have a sizable chunk of wealth that will be stripped away by inheritance taxes if they pass it down - not that they likely will - Boomers have been told they deserve a cushy retirement. Use that time and wealth to educate themselves and put it toward saving the white race, rather than golfing, cruises, and RVing.
My meaning of "apologize" is less about them offering up niceties, and definitely not about "groveling." It's about an acknowledgement of the wrong, and more importantly, helping to solve it. This is why I said "assigning of blame" isn't the right path - we can discuss these things among ourselves, explaining what went wrong and how, but if they don't want to hear it, we can't go rubbing their noses in it - they won't respond with acceptance. Their brainwashing by the media was turning them into ego-mad credit grabbers and blame-shifters: they blamed the prior generation for their struggles, and as evidenced by even the Conservaboomer in this case, blaming the subsequent generation for the problems of today.
Accusing them directly only puts them on the defensive. They should, however, recognize the reality: they made a big chunk of this mess, and therefore want to help straighten it out. They have a lot they can still do, and less to "lose" than those still raising kids and working all day to make ends meet.
They don't have a lot of years left, and they have a sizable chunk of wealth that will be stripped away by inheritance taxes if they pass it down - not that they likely will - Boomers have been told they deserve a cushy retirement. Use that time and wealth to educate themselves and put it toward saving the white race, rather than golfing, cruises, and RVing.
(post is archived)