On 'Boomer' Bashing... | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (11).

[–] • 0 pt

My meaning of "apologize" is less about them offering up niceties, and definitely not about "groveling." It's about an acknowledgement of the wrong, and more importantly, helping to solve it. This is why I said "assigning of blame" isn't the right path - we can discuss these things among ourselves, explaining what went wrong and how, but if they don't want to hear it, we can't go rubbing their noses in it - they won't respond with acceptance. Their brainwashing by the media was turning them into ego-mad credit grabbers and blame-shifters: they blamed the prior generation for their struggles, and as evidenced by even the Conservaboomer in this case, blaming the subsequent generation for the problems of today.

Accusing them directly only puts them on the defensive. They should, however, recognize the reality: they made a big chunk of this mess, and therefore want to help straighten it out. They have a lot they can still do, and less to "lose" than those still raising kids and working all day to make ends meet.

They don't have a lot of years left, and they have a sizable chunk of wealth that will be stripped away by inheritance taxes if they pass it down - not that they likely will - Boomers have been told they deserve a cushy retirement. Use that time and wealth to educate themselves and put it toward saving the white race, rather than golfing, cruises, and RVing.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

they blamed the prior generation for their struggles

How dare they! Blaming prior generation is not something we'd do.

My meaning of "apologize" is less about them offering up niceties, and definitely not about "groveling." It's about an acknowledgement of the wrong, and more importantly, helping to solve it. This is why I said "assigning of blame" isn't the right path - we can discuss these things among ourselves, explaining what went wrong and how, but if they don't want to hear it, we can't go rubbing their noses in it - they won't respond with acceptance.

Accusing them directly only puts them on the defensive. They should, however, recognize the reality: they made a big chunk of this mess, and therefore want to help straighten it out.

Read this back and pretend it's about reparation. Have you realize it?

And now try to think about how hard you are pushing back against the notion that you are being fooled by propaganda into hating older Whites, furthering the White genocide agenda. You can't deal with it. You are as defensive as a boomer.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

You're fucking retarded.

For starters, "reparations" as currently proposed, are for the collective blame and guilt of long-dead generations who may or may not have done something wrong, and there's no real paper trail to assess the "wrong" done in most cases. Additionally, it's mostly about extracting wealth, by force, from a group of people who are not responsible, directly or indirectly, for the wrong done. I am not demanding a dime and have no intention of taking it by force of state, even if I thought it were "owed."

In this case, however, there is ample evidence of the wrongdoing of the Baby Boomers, most of whom are very much alive. We can call out specific ones by name: Gates, Bezos, Eisner, Ellison, Turner, Bush, Obama, Clinton, Pence, and a host of others.

We have the receipts for the rank Boomer masses' treachery against the white race. For example, the so-called "concerned, conservative" parents who sent their kids to government schools post-Department of Education, post-bussing, post-integration, post-Trotskyite control of the system, aware of the evils, and yet who didn't bother seeking an alternative because it would have meant more work for them having to, gasp, home school, or even, heaven forbid, spend money on private schools.

We can see the parents who chose wealth over family by putting mother in the work force and tossing kids into daycare all so they could have a bigger house or a new TV, or that "family vacation," which the jews told them would make up for the hours spent in the office, as they had "quality time" at the expense of "quantity time." The unnecessary exhaustion of both parents at the end of their respective work days who plopped Timmy and Janey down in front of the electric jew to raise them rather than spending time engaging with them.

Of all of that wealth they acquired by sacrificing their kids, I don't demand a red fucking cent. Keep it. Flush it. Burn it. Spend it. Donate it. I don't care. They should, instead, realize how badly they fucked up and want to help the cause in whatever way possible. I can look to the example of my own parents easily, despite loving them and doing my best to compensate for their cataclysmic errors. I've succeeded in spite of their choices, not because of them. At the same time, I can also do a post failure analysis to assess where critically devastating choices were made and warning signs ignored.

I have no issue with Boomers assessing the "sins of the fathers." It's a legitimate practice. Of course, the blame they assign to theirs was almost exclusively false and trained into them by the jews. Your illiteracy prevented you from seeing the part where the Conservaboomer in question opted to blame the subsequent generation. That's not how it works. If I didn't raise my kids right, or if I didn't confront the situation when I saw my brother raising his kids the objectively wrong way, it's on me, albeit to a lesser extent in the second case. If my kids go out and make poor decisions in areas that I didn't train them properly, I absolutely should feel guilt about my failure to pass along what I know, and make the effort to correct the mistakes they're making, even if I lack the clout to do so effectively. That's the role of the parent and the older generation's responsibility to the ones that follow.

All that said, the Boomers were trained in dependent independence. They were the ones to demand their inheritance, not just financial, but of the heritage of liberty and real justice, and squander it in exchange for their own gratification, and they continue to do so today. It isn't about hate. It isn't about propaganda. It's about a legitimate assessment of what's happened and what must be done now to rectify it.

If they choose to not own their responsibilities or lift a finger to help, then so be it. It wouldn't surprise me in the least. They can kick back and enjoy their golden years blissfully as they watch the subsequent white generations burn, dwindle and suffer while they fiddle. I make no demand or claim on them, and neither should anyone else. It's on them and their largely numb consciences.

You're fucking retarded. For starters, "reparations" as currently proposed, are for the collective blame and guilt of long-dead generations who may or may not have done something wrong, and there's no real paper trail to assess the "wrong" done in most cases. Additionally, it's mostly about extracting wealth, by force, from a group of people who are not responsible, directly or indirectly, for the wrong done. I am not demanding a dime and have no intention of taking it by force of state, even if I thought it were "owed." In this case, however, there is ample evidence of the wrongdoing of the Baby Boomers, most of whom are very much alive. We can call out specific ones by name: Gates, Bezos, Eisner, Ellison, Turner, Bush, Obama, Clinton, Pence, and a host of others. We have the receipts for the rank Boomer masses' treachery against the white race. For example, the so-called "concerned, conservative" parents who sent their kids to government schools post-Department of Education, post-bussing, post-integration, post-Trotskyite control of the system, aware of the evils, and yet who didn't bother seeking an alternative because it would have meant more work for them having to, gasp, home school, or even, heaven forbid, spend money on private schools. We can see the parents who chose wealth over family by putting mother in the work force and tossing kids into daycare all so they could have a bigger house or a new TV, or that "family vacation," which the jews told them would make up for the hours spent in the office, as they had "quality time" at the expense of "quantity time." The unnecessary exhaustion of both parents at the end of their respective work days who plopped Timmy and Janey down in front of the electric jew to raise them rather than spending time engaging with them. Of all of that wealth they acquired by sacrificing their kids, I don't demand a red fucking cent. Keep it. Flush it. Burn it. Spend it. Donate it. I don't care. They should, instead, realize how badly they fucked up and want to help the cause in whatever way possible. I can look to the example of my own parents easily, despite loving them and doing my best to compensate for their cataclysmic errors. I've succeeded in spite of their choices, not because of them. At the same time, I can also do a post failure analysis to assess where critically devastating choices were made and warning signs ignored. I have no issue with Boomers assessing the "sins of the fathers." It's a legitimate practice. Of course, the blame they assign to theirs was almost exclusively false and trained into them by the jews. Your illiteracy prevented you from seeing the part where the Conservaboomer in question opted to blame the subsequent generation. That's not how it works. If I didn't raise my kids right, or if I didn't confront the situation when I saw my brother raising his kids the objectively wrong way, it's on me, albeit to a lesser extent in the second case. If my kids go out and make poor decisions in areas that I didn't train them properly, I absolutely should feel guilt about my failure to pass along what I know, and make the effort to correct the mistakes they're making, even if I lack the clout to do so effectively. That's the role of the parent and the older generation's responsibility to the ones that follow. All that said, the Boomers were trained in dependent independence. They were the ones to demand their inheritance, not just financial, but of the heritage of liberty and real justice, and squander it in exchange for their own gratification, and they continue to do so today. It isn't about hate. It isn't about propaganda. It's about a legitimate assessment of what's happened and what must be done now to rectify it. If they choose to not own their responsibilities or lift a finger to help, then so be it. It wouldn't surprise me in the least. They can kick back and enjoy their golden years blissfully as they watch the subsequent white generations burn, dwindle and suffer while they fiddle. I make no demand or claim on them, and neither should anyone else. It's on them and their largely numb consciences.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

The appeal and the arguments you used are applicable to reparation and most lefty arguments that are group based.

I don't demand a red fucking cent. Keep it. Flush it. Burn it. Spend it. Donate it. I don't care.

and they have a sizable chunk of wealth that will be stripped away by inheritance taxes if they pass it down - not that they likely will - Boomers have been told they deserve a cushy retirement. Use that time and wealth to educate themselves and put it toward saving the white race, rather than golfing, cruises, and RVing

You are asking for their wealth, you want them to use it for what you would like. You can repeat that you don't, but you asked for it and are now just arguing like a jew about it. It's rather amusing.

We can call out specific ones by name: Gates, Bezos, Eisner, Ellison, Turner, Bush, Obama, Clinton, Pence, and a host of others.

Then go after them.

We have the receipts for the rank Boomer masses' treachery against the white race. For example, the so-called "concerned, conservative" parents who sent their kids to government schools post-Department of Education, post-bussing, post-integration, post-Trotskyite control of the system, aware of the evils, and yet who didn't bother seeking an alternative because it would have meant more work for them having to, gasp, home school, or even, heaven forbid, spend money on private schools.

So you blame boomers (born 1946-1964) for using public school after the Dep of Education (1980). Then you must really hate the boomers' fathers who allowed integration after the two Supreme Court decision (1954 & 1957). You must really hate boomers' fathers for sending their kids to integrated school and allowing desegregation in general and the take over of the gov by jewish influence.

I have no issue with Boomers assessing the "sins of the fathers." It's a legitimate practice. Of course, the blame they assign to theirs was almost exclusively false and trained into them by the jews.

Oh, so their father's sins - allowing integration and all that - are almost exclusively false and trained into them by the jews, but the sins of your fathers are definitely not false and not trained into you by the jews. Sure...

I really wonder why you give a pass to their fathers' for integration, allowing the take over of the Gov by zionist, killing millions of Whites in Europe, etc. Blaming the generation that allowed that, is false and jewish tricks. This is some impressive shilling.

That's not how it works. If I didn't raise my kids right, or if I didn't confront the situation when I saw my brother raising his kids the objectively wrong way, it's on me, albeit to a lesser extent in the second case. If my kids go out and make poor decisions in areas that I didn't train them properly, I absolutely should feel guilt about my failure to pass along what I know, and make the effort to correct the mistakes they're making, even if I lack the clout to do so effectively.

But don't blame their fathers for failing to pass down good behaviors and correct the mistakes they're making, that's jewish trickery.

Your illiteracy prevented you from seeing the part where the Conservaboomer in question opted to blame the subsequent generation.

Such a juden conflict.

Your illiteracy prevented you from seeing that I don't blame either party for the conflict. White conservative intra-conflict are moronic juden divisiveness in which you are all too happy to partake.

It isn't about hate. It isn't about propaganda. It's about a legitimate assessment of what's happened and what must be done now to rectify it.

Threatening to murder boomers in their sleep isn't about hate? Falling for obvious jewish trick isn't falling for propaganda? Complaining about their use of wealth isn't about wanting to control their wealth? Rectify the situation involve not fragmenting an already tiny movement in even smaller useless parts.

I make no demand or claim on them

Really?

It should be a "Hey, guys, we know we fucked up.

They should, however, recognize the reality: they made a big chunk of this mess

Use that time and wealth to educate themselves and put it toward saving the white race, rather than golfing, cruises, and RVing.

They should, instead, realize how badly they fucked up

There is no shame in falling for a jew trick, it's very sophisticated propaganda, especially when it's rooted in some truth like this conflict is. I hope you eventually realize that pointing fingers and poking at people's chest is a pointless waste of time if you are trying to change someone's behavior. Anyone can deflect and blame others for the situation that we are in, that's the easy way out and people favor the easy way out.

Make the easy way out helping, not doubling down.

The appeal and the arguments you used are applicable to reparation and most lefty arguments that are group based. > I don't demand a red fucking cent. Keep it. Flush it. Burn it. Spend it. Donate it. I don't care. > and they have a sizable chunk of wealth that will be stripped away by inheritance taxes if they pass it down - not that they likely will - Boomers have been told they deserve a cushy retirement. Use that time and wealth to educate themselves and put it toward saving the white race, rather than golfing, cruises, and RVing You are asking for their wealth, you want them to use it for what you would like. You can repeat that you don't, but you asked for it and are now just arguing like a jew about it. It's rather amusing. > We can call out specific ones by name: Gates, Bezos, Eisner, Ellison, Turner, Bush, Obama, Clinton, Pence, and a host of others. Then go after them. > We have the receipts for the rank Boomer masses' treachery against the white race. For example, the so-called "concerned, conservative" parents who sent their kids to government schools post-Department of Education, post-bussing, post-integration, post-Trotskyite control of the system, aware of the evils, and yet who didn't bother seeking an alternative because it would have meant more work for them having to, gasp, home school, or even, heaven forbid, spend money on private schools. So you blame boomers (born 1946-1964) for using public school after the Dep of Education (1980). Then you must really hate the boomers' fathers who allowed integration after the two Supreme Court decision (1954 & 1957). You must really hate boomers' fathers for sending their kids to integrated school and allowing desegregation in general and the take over of the gov by jewish influence. > I have no issue with Boomers assessing the "sins of the fathers." It's a legitimate practice. Of course, the blame they assign to theirs was almost exclusively false and trained into them by the jews. Oh, so their father's sins - allowing integration and all that - are almost exclusively false and trained into them by the jews, but the sins of your fathers are definitely not false and not trained into you by the jews. Sure... I really wonder why you give a pass to their fathers' for integration, allowing the take over of the Gov by zionist, killing millions of Whites in Europe, etc. Blaming the generation that allowed that, is false and jewish tricks. This is some impressive shilling. > That's not how it works. If I didn't raise my kids right, or if I didn't confront the situation when I saw my brother raising his kids the objectively wrong way, it's on me, albeit to a lesser extent in the second case. If my kids go out and make poor decisions in areas that I didn't train them properly, I absolutely should feel guilt about my failure to pass along what I know, and make the effort to correct the mistakes they're making, even if I lack the clout to do so effectively. But don't blame their fathers for failing to pass down good behaviors and correct the mistakes they're making, that's jewish trickery. > Your illiteracy prevented you from seeing the part where the Conservaboomer in question opted to blame the subsequent generation. > Such a juden conflict. Your illiteracy prevented you from seeing that I don't blame either party for the conflict. White conservative intra-conflict are moronic juden divisiveness in which you are all too happy to partake. > It isn't about hate. It isn't about propaganda. It's about a legitimate assessment of what's happened and what must be done now to rectify it. Threatening to murder boomers in their sleep isn't about hate? Falling for obvious jewish trick isn't falling for propaganda? Complaining about their use of wealth isn't about wanting to control their wealth? Rectify the situation involve not fragmenting an already tiny movement in even smaller useless parts. > I make no demand or claim on them Really? > It should be a "Hey, guys, we know we fucked up. > They should, however, recognize the reality: they made a big chunk of this mess > Use that time and wealth to educate themselves and put it toward saving the white race, rather than golfing, cruises, and RVing. > They should, instead, realize how badly they fucked up There is no shame in falling for a jew trick, it's very sophisticated propaganda, especially when it's rooted in some truth like this conflict is. I hope you eventually realize that pointing fingers and poking at people's chest is a pointless waste of time if you are trying to change someone's behavior. Anyone can deflect and blame others for the situation that we are in, that's the easy way out and people favor the easy way out. Make the easy way out helping, not doubling down.

parent
link