I actually read the article because I wanted to try and understand its point. I failed. I wonder if this was an AI produced piece. There were facts and comparisons, yet no point to it. Extremely odd, even for mainstream media.
I actually read the article because I wanted to try and understand its point. I failed. I wonder if this was an AI produced piece. There were facts and comparisons, yet no point to it. Extremely odd, even for mainstream media.
it's weird also b/c a source who had reviewed the jfk material basically said the cia did it on tucker carlson. The bits that point the finger explicitly at the cia are still classified apparently.
it's weird also b/c a source who had reviewed the jfk material basically said the cia did it on tucker carlson. The bits that point the finger explicitly at the cia are still classified apparently.
(post is archived)