Why is it unlikely that a strategic enemy like Putin would try and interfere in its opponent's election cycle to have influence over the outcome?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (16).

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

>Just as they managed to make drilling for under the ocean profitable through extensive innovation. In order for this to take place, there must be governmental tools available. The free market is an extremely powerful tool of innovation, but it must work within the confines of regulation which point the cannon of capitalism in the right, and not the wrong direction.

1) There's no free market, and it's not new, now it's apparent

2) They buy all the innovation/intellectual properties, and they hold them, they hoard if you will. And they won't release the next "thing" until the old thing is no longer generating a profit. It's called maximization of profit. And the next thing, will be as much of a toll as the old, otherwise, it's not interesting, they aren't going to shoot themselves in the foot.

3) Asking .gov to step in and do something about it, is to forget who runs the show here, who pays who to do what. The golden rule. He who has the gold makes the rules. Always has been always will be.

...

You're looking for solutions at the wrong place. THE solution, isn't a new toy from the toy makers, and government isn't salvation. The solution, the real solution, is spiritual and moral, at the individual level, all over the collective; you don't need cops to enforce the Law, when everybody is his own cop, acting in good faith, to put it simply.

And yes it's the cheapest solution, it's not about money, and it's also the hardest to achieve and at the same time the simplest, and in the end it's the only real solution

And it's also an utopia, we'll never make it, too much dumb people, too much niggers if you will, self absorbed drones, all about muh dick, and it will never change, it's always been like that

Now, another solution, is to do the exact opposite of what you suggest; Not more intervention, .gov or otherwise. Much less, none, stop helping, let it die en masse. Survivors will get a chance to start over. Death is the ultimate fail safe.

Talking about "anthropogenic climate change" Do you know why africa's demography looks like this? https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/55d38ec0dd089595388b46c6-750-563.png

You think this isn't a problem?

It looks like this because we've been "helping", we prevent death from offsetting birth. At the end of the day we all end up with one steak for 10, what do we do with that?

You seem concerned by the environment, what to say about that? https://silverbirdtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Slum.jpg

What do you do with billions of idiots, entire nations, like that? Why do people let things turn to shit, like that? Because they are retarded, because they end up using tech they couldn't have come up with on their own.... And then end up dealing with issues they can't handle, unsurprisingly....

>>Just as they managed to make drilling for under the ocean profitable through extensive innovation. In order for this to take place, there must be governmental tools available. The free market is an extremely powerful tool of innovation, but it must work within the confines of regulation which point the cannon of capitalism in the right, and not the wrong direction. 1) There's no free market, and it's not new, now it's apparent /s/markets 2) They buy all the innovation/intellectual properties, and they hold them, they hoard if you will. And they won't release the next "thing" until the old thing is no longer generating a profit. It's called maximization of profit. And the next thing, will be as much of a toll as the old, otherwise, it's not interesting, they aren't going to shoot themselves in the foot. 3) Asking .gov to step in and do something about it, is to forget who runs the show here, who pays who to do what. The golden rule. He who has the gold makes the rules. Always has been always will be. ... You're looking for solutions at the wrong place. THE solution, isn't a new toy from the toy makers, and government isn't salvation. The solution, the real solution, is spiritual and moral, at the individual level, all over the collective; you don't need cops to enforce the Law, when everybody is his own cop, acting in good faith, to put it simply. And yes it's the cheapest solution, it's not about money, and it's also the hardest to achieve and at the same time the simplest, and in the end it's the only real solution And it's also an utopia, we'll never make it, too much dumb people, too much niggers if you will, self absorbed drones, all about muh dick, and it will never change, it's always been like that Now, another solution, is to do the exact opposite of what you suggest; Not more intervention, .gov or otherwise. Much less, none, stop helping, let it die en masse. Survivors will get a chance to start over. Death is the ultimate fail safe. Talking about "anthropogenic climate change" Do you know why africa's demography looks like this? https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/55d38ec0dd089595388b46c6-750-563.png You think this isn't a problem? It looks like this because we've been "helping", we prevent death from offsetting birth. At the end of the day we all end up with one steak for 10, what do we do with that? You seem concerned by the environment, what to say about that? https://silverbirdtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Slum.jpg What do you do with billions of idiots, entire nations, like that? Why do people let things turn to shit, like that? Because they are retarded, because they end up using tech they couldn't have come up with on their own.... And then end up dealing with issues they can't handle, unsurprisingly....

parent
link

(post is archived)

You can claim this sub in /s/subrequest