WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

291

It starts of by quoting Martin Ziguélé without ever explaining who Martin Ziguélé is.

It later says that he was third in the poll. What poll? Do they mean election? Why did they use the word poll?

It then says Martin Ziguélé is calling for more UN presence. But who is he to be calling for that?

Half of Central African Republic's population is dependent on humanitarian aid, says the article. Is the person who wrote this one of them?

Why are we taking the word of a third place winner of some unmentioned poll, as reported by someone who can't write?

Notice also that the article doesn't give us the author's name. That's a bad development if that's the direction press is going in.

I guess the BBC takes sole responsibility for this shit stain of an article. You saw it here with your own eyes. BBC is not professional journalism. Can't even write for shit.

It starts of by quoting Martin Ziguélé without ever explaining who Martin Ziguélé is. It later says that he was third in the poll. What poll? Do they mean election? Why did they use the word poll? It then says Martin Ziguélé is calling for more UN presence. But who is he to be calling for that? Half of Central African Republic's population is dependent on humanitarian aid, says the article. Is the person who wrote this one of them? Why are we taking the word of a third place winner of some unmentioned poll, as reported by someone who can't write? Notice also that the article doesn't give us the author's name. That's a bad development if that's the direction press is going in. I guess the BBC takes sole responsibility for this shit stain of an article. You saw it here with your own eyes. BBC is not professional journalism. Can't even write for shit.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I too make every sentence its own paragraph. Also, archive this shit. I hate giving them even one extra view.